Who pays more taxes?
Greetings friends!
It is often said that Warren Buffett, the renowned investor, once remarked that he pays less taxes than his secretary. I don’t know whether it was truly said by him or not, but it points towards a harsh reality of our economic system. This statement highlights the truth that the ultra-wealthy often pay a smaller percentage of their income in taxes compared to the average salaried persons. This isn't just a flaw in the system—it's a feature of a system deliberately designed to benefit the rich at the expense of the working class.
The wealthy have numerous legal ways to reduce their tax burden. Governments around the world provide them with almost free access to land, resources, and favorable loans to encourage the creation of businesses. In countries like India, tax holidays are often offered to attract industrialists. Once a factory or company is established, it enjoys various privileges, such as tax rebates on land purchases or leases, free or subsidized electricity, and other financial incentives.
For the average taxpayer, taxes are imposed on their gross income, meaning they must live on whatever remains after paying income tax and other direct taxes. After the leftover, they have to pay indirect taxes as well. In contrast, companies calculate their income only after deducting all business-related expenses. They also benefit from depreciation, which reduces their taxable income. When a salaried individual buys a car, they pay taxes on that purchase, but a company can claim depreciation on the same purchase, thereby lowering its tax liability. The system allows businesses to use the depreciation of assets to reduce their taxes—an advantage that ordinary wage earners can never enjoy.
If an individual takes out a loan to buy a car, he cannot claim a tax deduction based on the interest payments to reduce his taxable income. However, companies can deduct loan interest payments, further reducing their tax burden. Additionally, businesses typically secure loans at lower interest rates, while individuals face higher rates and harsher consequences if they default. In extreme cases, when large companies are unable to repay their loans, they often receive bailout packages. So the reality is: if you owe the bank 100,000 rupees, it’s your problem; if you owe the bank 1 billion rupees, it’s the bank’s problem.
The wealthy often conduct personal expenditures under the guise of business expenses. Hotel stays, travel, housing, and even foreign vacations are all often paid for by their companies, which then deduct these costs as business expenses to reduce their taxable income.
These are the legal methods used by the rich to minimize their taxes. But beyond that, there are countless ways in which they evade taxes, stepping into illegal territory. The rich influence governments, shape policies, and ensure that the system serves their interests. This is why you rarely see a billionaire topping the list of the highest taxpayers. Meanwhile, those with lower incomes are burdened by indirect taxes, even if they don't pay direct taxes.
The middle class, particularly salaried employees, bear the brunt of the tax burden. Between direct and indirect taxes, they may end up paying between 60-80% of their income in taxes. They work harder to increase their earnings, only to see much of that income diminished by heavy taxation. This dynamic traps the middle class in a rat race—they work relentlessly, unable to save much, so they work harder, pays more taxes and so on. This is the unfortunate reality of our global economic system. Despite of this, many middle class salaried person thinks that this is the best system in the world.
Thank you!
Hi @akdx
Taxes. One of my less favourite words hehe
Except that it is not true. He may have paid less in income taxes, but we also pay taxes whenever we spend money (like VAT tax added to every single product or service). We pay taxes when we fly in the plane, when we pump petrol etc.
So if Warren Buffett said those words then he was just full of shit.
Wealthy may be able to optimize income tax and perhaps percentage-wise they often pay less than regular people do. But they still pay enormous amount of money in form of taxes. Even when buying expensive property alone.
If those who are succesful (and as a result becoming rich) would not benefit then what would be the point of being succesful? We need rich and working class. One cannot exist without the other.
Cheers, Piotr
They may pay bit more than others but it is also true that they have too much money and they also have lots of methods to save taxes while common man cannot do so.
Dear @akdx I guess I get your point, but let me put this in perspective. I as a born german will do it with our salaries and taxes, but this will work in Spain, France and other countries in the same maner, I dont know the tax rates from India but I cant believe that the system over there is so much different for the company owner.
I´ve made a table for you to see what I mean, because that means that the owner of the company (the rich) get´s way less salary out of 1 Million than 20 workers with in total the same income of 1 Million.
Dear @don-t, companies have so many ways to save taxes. Even if the owner of a company not getting much salary, he or she can save more than the employees because of owning the company. Top rich's contribution may be more than other groups but compared to their wealth that would be lesser than others.
In my country no top rich person comes in the list of the top tax payer. This is the reality.
Thank you for your reply @akdx
...but please dont forget he is having all the monetary risk on his side, he pays with the turnover from his company the salaries from all the worker (dont matter how high or low they are, thats maybe a thing for a workers union to discus such things), if there is a kind of healthcare payment/contribution the company so he pays for that too(I´m not sure about if and what kind of healthcare the company in India has to pay or if there is none).
when I look on the table (picture) this doesnt seems to me an unfair share from the few "rich companies" compared to the numbers of the personal income taxes from "all the rest" nearly 687 Million people including the richest with personal income, the companies pay nearly 38% of all taxes, counting in the top richest personal incom tax payers you would easily come to more than 50% of the tax revenue.
In total that means 5 crores rupees per individual in paid taxes, this looks way fairer than in the Us or in Germany for instance.
Is there any restrictions/limitations in India to start a business for an individual ?
If not everybody should have the chance to do his own business (maybe not as sucessfull as the big Co´s) and gain more money, had better options to set costs against gains and so ship around the problem that you mentioned (not having the chance to deduct any against the salary like the Co´s).
I hope I got all the points correct and clear, but I guess there was no points I could have overlseen, if so please feel free to explain and correct me.
amazing feedback buddy