RE: Perhaps anarchy already exists and "THE COMMUNITY" is merely the highest manifestation of organized crime.
The rules should never be changed with the express purpose of targeting any specific account(s).
I have had real trouble articulating a response to your last posts and comments.
However, as usual i have been poking around, looking at account behavior and drawing some conclusions.
As you know, the narrative we have been fed is that there was a perceived treat to the integrity of the platform. If the treat was real, then I would say that hard forking J Sun's Stake out of the new chain was justifiable.
What is unjustifiable in my mind, is targeting other peoples accounts and keeping the proceeds for themselves.
Some of the instigators of the Fork are still active on the Steem Blockchain. Some have halted their power down and are voting witnesses for a day or so then removing the votes and voting other witnesses, maintaining their flag campaigns against accounts which have opposed them in the past.
Those activities make it difficult to establish stable governance and IMHO should be viewed as a hostile threat to the Steem Blockchain.
If was in J Suns position I would use my Stake to maintain witnesses who would protect the Chain and hard fork them out.
The most amusing thing to me is all the complaining going on about censorship. What happened to their own argument of The Blockchain is immutable and you can still be seen on other front ends?
100% this.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find the critical logical errors and conflicts within the Holacracy Constitution,
Click to watch full analysis, especially the Q&A session,
Gosh I would not where to begin. I have looked at the Holacracy thing before and I know they keep updating their Constitution. If I remember correctly it is NOT a user friendly document.
This guy rubbed me up the wrong way for some reason, not sure why. I am more intuitive than logical.
Despite my deficiencies (especially with regard to language) I have held management positions from the age of 19. I have never applied for a role as manger, I have always been invited. This is probably because I do not attempt to dominate people and do not tolerate those that do.
We are not so different from animals with regard to our natural inclination to organize ourselves into hierarchical structures. These hierarchies need not be tyrannical but unfortunately often are.
A less cumbersome approach than Holacracy may be to adopt NVC
I just looked up the definition of holacracy:
A holacracy is a governance structure characterized by a distribution of power among self-organizing groups, rather than the top-down authority in the typical hierarchical corporate culture model. A holacracy provides a flat management structure that distributes authority.
That pretty much describes my management style anyway and it has worked for me. However I was managing a small US owned NGO here in NZ and those guys are psychopathic. Not just that organisation but that whole Corporate world. It was a huge eye opener for me