The Evolution Of Decentralized Governance Models In Blockchain Projects

Source

The essence of blockchain projects stems from decentralized governance, which allows a multi-user account holder decision system devoid of central entities. This is a stark contrast to a traditional governance model which is usually concentrated within a few decision-making individuals leading to inefficient and opaque systems. Blockchain governance offers the possibility of more community and democracy oriented governance systems.

Over the years, models for decentralized governance have improved incorporating new and better mechanisms that allow for increased equality and efficiency. Everything from on-chain voting systems to DAOs, or decentralized autonomous organizations, are being experimented with in blockchain systems. This aim to self-propelling ecosystems will allow users a direct voice in policy decisions and protocol changes.

Improved transparency, security features, and community participation are some of the most notable advantages of decentralized governance. Adaptation to changes comes with a price, in this case pares with the expansion of a blockchain project which in turn invites challenges like governance attacks, voter apathy, and scalability. All mentioned above pointers should be taken into consideration in the design of robust and resilient governance systems.

Initial Models of Governance in Blockchain Technology:

Early forms of governance within blockchain was mostly focused on the developers. It was projects like Bitcoin and Ethereum that depended heavily upon core development teams supplemented with miners to propose and apply changes. This centralized order ensured a level of stability while oftentimes disregarding the community decision-making process.

Like most other aspects of Bitcoin, its governance is very rudimentary and relies on improvement proposals being discussed by developers and miners. The system of proposal and voting on changes in Ethereum, through EIPs or Ethereum Improvement Proposals, was more advanced. Unfortunately, the final decision making process was still under the influence of core developers.

Although these earlier structures made certain that talented individuals made the decisions, there were serious issues with decentralization. There was reduced user input regarding system upgrades which stirred up the much-needed debate regarding the design, governance, and principals of participation for the community.

The Growth of On-Chain Governance:

On-chain governance was born as a means for increasing community engagement as blockchain projects developed. On-chain governance gives the ability to directly vote for changes in the protocol by token owners and lowers the dependence on central teams. This model is used in projects like Tezos and Decred.

In on-chain governance, different types of proposals are made and voted by token owners according to the quantity of the tokens they possess. This system makes the decision-making process more open and accessible, thus cutting out the middlemen. Although, it does have downsides, such as becoming a victim to manipulation by the wealthy on large scales, enabling votes to dominate.

Source

Although it has its own issues, on-chain governance has made greater strides toward decentralized decision-making processes. The ability to participate directly with decision making means that these blockchain projects can adapt to community changes in a timely fashion, while still ensuring transparency and security in their governance.

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs):

The emergence of DAOs brought an improvement to governance on the blockchain by forming totally decentralized structures overseen by smart contracts. With DAOs, decision-making processes can be managed without the need for a single leader, as stakeholders can vote on the proposals and resources put forth for consideration.

The first of such DAOs, ‘The DAO’, was developed on Ethereum in 2016. Its launch did not succeed in enhancing security, but the structure of The DAO was a conceptual precursor to more advanced systems of governance like MakerDAO and Aragon, which enabled a more democratic style governance through token based voting.

In response to governance attacks and low voting turnout, there are ongoing innovations in DAOs. By using smart contract technology, redundant processes are minimized and transparency is enhanced. This supports allocation of decision making powers from a central authority to the community and increases the potential and effectiveness of the blockchain project.

The Evolution of Decentralized Governance:

As the different models of governance on the blockchain develop, so too does the use of hybrid governance which encompasses elements of both on-chain and off-chain governance. This type of governance is called hybrid because it achieves a middle ground between the need for transparency and the need for flexibility that comes with community voting and expert advisory boards or delegated governance.

Governance models like those used in Polkadot or Cosmos that combine protocols with community governance through councils that possess technical expertise benefit from this model since it is more resistant to governance manipulation and allows for governance decentralization and community participation.

The future of decentralized governance may very well aim at increasing voter engagement, improving mechanisms for preventing attacks, and developing more equitable voting systems. Changes to the governance models will have to be carried out parallel to the development of blockchain technology so as to provide rational decision making in the decentralized networks.

Conclusion

Source

The evolution of decentralized governance in blockchain projects has facilitated the shift of decision making from a centralized team to a community-driven model. Initial governance models were based on centralized developers, however, with the emergence of on-chain governance and DAOs, more stakeholders can participate.

The combination of democratic accountability and hierarchical efficiency allows these models to have a great potential for sustainability. Improving governance systems will be fundamental for the creation of efficient and democratic decentralized systems as the adoption of blockchains increases.