RE: ᔕᑕᗷ Autovotes vs Manual Upvote
Another interesting topic, and your explanation is excellent (easy to understand). 😊
In my opinion,and I see Autovoting in a positive light, Autovotes mean that you (Fanbase) keep special users in your favorite list and set a voting percentage in advance, which is applied automatically after a certain time (5 minutes). The benefit of this is that if you are busy and can't spend time on Steemit, your vote won't go to waste.
And I think this service is mostly used by users who have a lot of Steem Power or have made significant investments. But users like me, who don't have much Steem Power and don't have time constraints, prefer to use manual voting. Both have their own importance, but I've never used it ( Autovotes) myself because I prefer manual voting.
That is the point, we live on "Steemit ecosystem" like in real nature in order to have healthy forest we need to plant different art of trees and not only one art even though it is useful. The same with sea inhabitants we need sharks, plankton, whales, jelly fishes each of them have their role.
That is why, curation reward is useful not only for large accounts but small. For many large accounts they do not post but they want their interest and this is a way.
We can not blame them if they want high % of return, this is the same like any users who post and would like to have high Upvote.
It is useful tool and definitely very helpful, people can set it up for certain percent and still upvote manually. Thanks you for your feedback.
You're right, a diverse and healthy community is like a forest with many types of trees or a sea with many types of inhabitants. Each plays a vital role. Curation rewards help keep the ecosystem balanced, benefiting both small and large accounts. It's a useful tool that allows for manual upvoting while setting a percentage for automation. Thanks for sharing your insights.
Thanks a lot @wakeupkitty 🌹 , TeamTrue Colors for supporting my comment and encouraging me. I really appreciate it.