I just give a general opinion about support for users who have never written about introductions. Most users understand that writing a self-introduction is not an obligation, they can participate or not.

Then the positive side of this program is that newcomers can understand the platform ecosystem as a whole. What I mean is not at the point of introduction, but getting to know the platform more broadly such as about using the pdf copy obtained when registering, and being able to use tools for their needs.

Many cases of account hacking are caused by their lack of understanding, will those who follow this program guarantee that their level of understanding is directly proportional to its implementation? I think not, if completing achievements is only a symbol without understanding what is written. Well ... This is what has triggered the problem so far. Using random keys outside of needs.

As a Steem Representative and curation team, I have approached them so that they can use the appropriate tag so that it can be found and meet the support criteria. But the result is 0, they don't even care, sometimes they just reply thank you without any follow-up.

I have been running curation for a long time, maybe only absent for 1 month, I do not search for content based on hashtags, but start searching from the latest posts to the past few days.

So I want to say that providing support must look at several aspects, first fulfilling the requirements for support such as being free of plagiarism, not repeated posts (already published), I traced many of them who did not give a positive response because the images used came from certain websites that were not free to use, besides that they said that "that's my writing, I wrote it on reddit".

When investigated further, it turned out that users repeatedly carried out negative behavior.

How to give them support, while they don't care.