You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Programming Diary #29: Imagining the "value per feed" curation model

in Steem Dev3 days ago

the ROI for a successful author can be much higher than for the old-skool services, so that will (theoretically) attract more top-tier contributors.

For this to happen, my assumption is that somebody else’s rewards would need to be much lower - initiating their migration to other services.

I don’t know what kind of margin these voting services work with but the only way to avoid the “robbing Peter to pay Paul” analogy would be if they were willing to reduce their margins. Or maintain a higher voting capability themselves. i.e. the delegated amount will earn a consistent x% vote per STEEM delegated and the top authors are competing over the services own y STEEM vote value.

That could work.

Sort:  
 3 days ago 

And maybe the value for "y" could be increased by receiving delegations from non-author investors who are interested in protecting the value of their stake from devaluation. As @dan put it some years ago, (paraphrasing) an upvote for one post is the same as a downvote for all others.

Additionally, non-author delegators could be further incentivized with a share of curation rewards.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.20
JST 0.035
BTC 91274.52
ETH 3158.75
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.10