The Steemit Platform Is Nothing Without Curators

The blockchain technology is still early. Since the Steem blockchain is still in its early stages of development, nothing is yet flawless. Although the possibility to curate or upvote material is very enticing to new users, the system still requires significant development.

Simply put, we require more content curators who have high upvote values.

Given that the majority of users on Steemit are interested in author rewards and that becoming a content creator on the platform is much simpler than becoming a content curator, there are very few Steemit users who have a high upvote value. Additionally, some users with high hive power or upvote values do not care about curator rewards.

If you're a brilliant writer, you can make a respectable living as a content creator, but you can't make a living as a content curator until you invest a lot of money or build up enough stewm power over a number of years.

We don't simply require content creators; if everyone is a content creator or if no one is willing to upvote, then it will not work or won't aid in the progress of the Steem blockchain.

Due to the fact that there are many better alternatives with the same amount of investment and higher returns, people find Steem curation rewards to be less appealing than they once were. I'm referring to APR%

I'm not a computer expert, thus I don't know in detail how the curators' or upvotes' systems evolved or operated at the protocol level.