That's difficult to determine - the content is predominantly information which will always show signs of being AI generated. The context that the information is being shared is also relevant.
The above is the output from the technique that I tend to use.
It's this bit at the end which makes me hesitant:
While it’s possible a human wrote this with reference materials...
Which would make sense - as it would for somebody writing a post like this to use AI to review it.
Point 2 suggests AI.
Point 5 suggest human.
Point 4 suggests a combination of both.
using a structured but somewhat unnatural writing style.
This suggess human.
It's difficult - I've skimmed a couple of other posts and I'm struggling to get a feel for his writing style. His latest post ("A dive into time at the famous "Café Al Khattab Ala Al Bab" in the medina of Tunis") feels more AI but the same test suggests that it's not.
I'd generally say that if AI is used without reference, it's normally by people who are too lazy to write for themselves. In this case, we know that the author will have to work hard - reading and reviewing every entry that they get.
Like I say, it's difficult to say it's AI with much confidence. I see that you've left a comment, let's see what response it gets.
Here is my claim about @kouba01, please review it, It is a matter of injustice and a matter of user's rights on this platform.
My one Bangla Muslim brother @mahadisalim was given 10/10 scores. That is a fruit of his efforts. Well he was given 2/2 marks for the same kind of explanations as mine but I scored 1.8/2 which impacted my overmarks for doing this. 0.2 marks were deducted by not comparing the USB 3.0 and 2.0 into a table. I have well explained the difference in lines. By the way, as a medical student, I was unknows from many motherboard components and I made a well-explained search about the mentioned tasks. It enhanced my knowledge al lot. I took me 6 days to complete task with deep and thought understandings. My question is that I did not got the fruit of my efforts as I explained. Even, I explained Evaluation mentioned by @kouba01, not performed by @mahadisalim. Then why my marks were deducted in this regards? Does teachers have no definite method to distribute marks. Only minor and useless points were indicated leading the cut of my marks.
I think really, this platform has no justice and equality.
This is an analysis of whole blog except homework questions and final feedback.
That's difficult to determine - the content is predominantly information which will always show signs of being AI generated. The context that the information is being shared is also relevant.
The above is the output from the technique that I tend to use.
It's this bit at the end which makes me hesitant:
Which would make sense - as it would for somebody writing a post like this to use AI to review it.
Point 2 suggests AI.
Point 5 suggest human.
Point 4 suggests a combination of both.
This suggess human.
It's difficult - I've skimmed a couple of other posts and I'm struggling to get a feel for his writing style. His latest post ("A dive into time at the famous "Café Al Khattab Ala Al Bab" in the medina of Tunis") feels more AI but the same test suggests that it's not.
Ok you are right. Same sites and software is used to detect AI of other accounts and the results are considered to be very accurate in this regards.
0.00 SBD,
0.30 STEEM,
0.30 SP
I'd generally say that if AI is used without reference, it's normally by people who are too lazy to write for themselves. In this case, we know that the author will have to work hard - reading and reviewing every entry that they get.
Like I say, it's difficult to say it's AI with much confidence. I see that you've left a comment, let's see what response it gets.
Here is my claim about @kouba01, please review it, It is a matter of injustice and a matter of user's rights on this platform.
My one Bangla Muslim brother @mahadisalim was given 10/10 scores. That is a fruit of his efforts. Well he was given 2/2 marks for the same kind of explanations as mine but I scored 1.8/2 which impacted my overmarks for doing this. 0.2 marks were deducted by not comparing the USB 3.0 and 2.0 into a table. I have well explained the difference in lines. By the way, as a medical student, I was unknows from many motherboard components and I made a well-explained search about the mentioned tasks. It enhanced my knowledge al lot. I took me 6 days to complete task with deep and thought understandings. My question is that I did not got the fruit of my efforts as I explained. Even, I explained Evaluation mentioned by @kouba01, not performed by @mahadisalim. Then why my marks were deducted in this regards? Does teachers have no definite method to distribute marks. Only minor and useless points were indicated leading the cut of my marks.
I think really, this platform has no justice and equality.
Moreover...............
0.00 SBD,
0.30 STEEM,
0.30 SP
If you don't like a way that a teacher marks the entries they received, then simply don't enter a challenge that the teacher is setting.
There are enough alternatives for you to find a teacher that you feel treats everybody equally.
For me to give you an honest opinion, I'd need to review both posts - along with everybody else's and I've got absolutely no intention of doing that.
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.02 SP