Ich halte den Anreiz durch das vote des @steemcurator01 - xy für kontraproduktiv
Durch dieses Vote meinen viele sie müssten nur die Taktzahl ihrer Post erhöhen um irgendwann ein Vote von besagtem zu erhalten.
Dicke Votes machen keine guten Schreiber , sie erhöhen höchsten die Post Frequenzen und Katzen ,Essen und Toilettenbilder .
Der Steemcurator ist so von seinem Tun überzeugt das er nicht einmal merkt wie arrogant sein Wirken hier ist !!!
VgA
Hi atego,
This is the second time you commented under my post. First of all thank you for stopping by.
You are entitled to your opinion, just like every other Steemian. The opinion of "counterproductivity" in relation to curation accounts is an interesting interpretation, but I will differ here. For example, some segments in newspapers are daily, some are weekly, and some are monthly. So, to each their own.
Every writer should have a conscience of their own :)
I think we're talking past each other, but ok
VgA
I agree. They definitely don't make good writers. They are just a small part of motivation for the newbies (specifically) and others (generally).
And they should (and I assume are) not the reason of low quality posts. Here is where I am talking about the conscience of the writer.
Regards
We speak two different languages, let's leave it at that, that leads to nothing!!
VgA
:(