RE: Steemit Crypto Academy Feedback
I believe the beginners level should be mainly for beginners. There should be a system whereby we would not allow intermediate/advanced class students to participate in beginners' homework tasks, as such the beginners won't be deprived of their rewards. Or higher-level students can be allowed to participate but won't be considered for rewards like.......
Professor @fredquantum, I appreciate your feedback. Indeed you wrote your feedback from your heart. Thanks for not just writing from the Professor's angle alone.
However, I disagree with your first statement from the highlighted statements.
A times, there are some topics in the beginner class that a student may like and wish to take part in. If such a student is an advanced student, with that rule, s/he will not have access to it.
Also, there are some tasks in the advanced class that require the use of software that often not compatible with some laptops or so, in that case, students do lower courses like intermediate or beginners courses.
So if we go by that rule, the entry in the crypto academy will greatly reduce.
However, if the academy wants to go by that, then increasing the courses in each level can also be a way out. By that, students won't have reason to go to the lower classes to make entry.
Kind regards,
@msquaretwins.
Thanks for sharing your opinion on this, @msquaretwins. There are two things up there, in the highlighted paragraph, which comes with OR and in that part, I have highlighted that users can be allowed to participate in all levels but the special beginners' rewards shouldn't be deprived of, in such a case where it's been taken away by the advanced level students.
How would a beginner feel if someone that has won a superstar in the advanced tier comes back to win it again in the beginners' tier? Or end up winning the top 3 week in week out while the beginners are left stranded. This is very possible if things continue the way it is. The beginners' should be credited for winnings at their level and not be deprived in any way. I hope you can look back at that section of the article again and see the two things I've discussed there, and not limit to first part alone. It's feedback anyway and the Steemit team would make the right decision in the end. Thanks once again.
Professor @fredquantum, thanks for your response. Yea, and that's why I specifically direct it to your first statement. I know there are two things up there, and there may be acceptance of either one of the statements. I just pointed out my opinion, and direct consequence of the acceptance of your first statement.
Alright, brother. Well understood. Have a great day.