Remarks:

• The presentation style of your assignments is "Excellent", since, you present order in the format and your structure is of quality. Your cover image is not related to the topic we are working on, which is very bad. The text separators in your presentation were very good. I encourage you to keep improving and to continue with that same pace in your presentations.

• The quality of the content is "Good-Regular, since, you covered with clarity and fluency most of the important details regarding the concepts of "Price Action, however with the "Equilibrium Point" it was not so, your definition is wrong, besides you did not clearly point out in your example that point.

• You have a "Good-Regular" understanding of the strategy and analysis technique in conjunction with "Price Action", since, according to the step-by-step and criteria you described, you covered most of the important details about them, so, some of the factors are correct, but others are not.

• Your answer on what type of analysis is best was well justified and valid.

• In the last question, I wanted to see if the students had understood the strategy of the Price Action technique with the "Equilibrium Point", so, your performance was "Poor", since, you did not correctly point out the equilibrium point in the screenshots you shared, so, the possible input is already wrong.

Appreciate your efforts in Crypto Academy and look forward to seeing your next assignments.