You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Crypto Academy Feedback.
yes I know that, but system and user are inseparable. There will always be someone trying to manipulate the system, we just need to catch him but don't involve other users. Because if people get bored and burdened with lots of rules, they will stop playing and that will also be a loss for the platform. Correct me if it's wrong.
Of course, so that the rules are not boring, the rewards must be consistent.
But what I do believe is that like every game there should be levels of difficulty and the higher the difficulty, the greater the rewards.
I agree that yes, there can be many users and you have to attract them, but that differentiation must exist to encourage climbing to higher levels and then the desired quality can exist.
But obviously a platform like Steemit will not reward users just for being present. I don't know if I explain myself.
If you are rewarded just for being there, it will be difficult to control spam, plagiarism and poor quality.
absolutely agree with you. We are not reward just to be present in steemit, but we must try and publish the post as best we can.
This is what has been missing recently at SCA 😝.
Yes, I think SCA so far is consistent.
It is good to incorporate some improvements.
And surely if you are very good you will get good grades and good rewards 😊