RE: Steemit Crypto Academy Feedback.
Students with advanced repo participate in intermediate and basic levels and get good grades and thereby quality for weakly rewards and thereby deprive the students of concerned levels of their rights.
I agree with your point of view, but a user with an advanced repo can't get a bigger prize if he gets the highest rank I think it's illogical, because if that's the case, using an advanced or intermediate repo will make bad posts. There must also be a clear structure. For example, users have to choose at the beginning of the season, whether to join an advanced, intermediate, or beginner class. If you have joined one of these classes, you cannot join other classes. But I think this is not possible
homework tasks mist be balanced. at times, the length of homework tasks is disproportionately more than the corresponding level based rewards.
For this point, I 100% agree with you because last season there were several homework assignments that reached 10 questions in the Intermediate class. Not suitable for intermediate class with 10 questions.
I would make club5050 optional with additional rewards for those who participate in it and also additional rewards for club75 and club100 users.
Totally agree with your opinion. However, in the previous season, the prizes were the same for users who participated in club75, club5050, and club100.
I would abandon the 150 SP rule and lower repo for advanced courses from 65 to 61.
Agreed, I prefer this rule removed. However for repos no problem I think.
To promote plagiarism free content, I would ban those students, for at least one week, who are found posting plagiarized content.
I Agree with you.
The more rules that are enforced, the fewer users will participate, and this will harm the steem ecosystem, because social media really needs users. A real example has occurred in the Utopian.io era, after Utopian.io imposed strict regulations, people started to lose interest and many steem users stopped, causing steem to be distraught until it had to be sold and the price of steem was really broken at that time.
You failed to understand what I mean. There should be no restriction on participating in any course. I am talking of weekly rewards. Suppose, if 10 advanced repo users and 10 beginner level users participate in a beginners level homework. There is higher probability that advanced users get top 3 weekly ranks. So beginners are deprived of weekly rewards. On the other hand, if advanced users are not eligible for weekly rewards, they will still make good quality posts to get better rewards excluding weekly. At the same time, three beginners will be rewarded weekly and would help beginners grow fast and encourage them to produce quality content.
You are right.
Thank you.
I think it’s the main reason they bring all these rules, to minimize the number of users in the academy. This way no pressure will be much on curators
No that's not the sole reason. Rules are in place to promote creation of quality content and prevent users from spamming the system.
It should not happen, the less people who use steemit the closer to destruction. basically all platforms and social media need their users.
Hello, they do need users, but not just any user. And today there are many people who are willing to follow the rules. What networks need are users who engage, and this can be done by users who are committed to the system.
yes I know that, but system and user are inseparable. There will always be someone trying to manipulate the system, we just need to catch him but don't involve other users. Because if people get bored and burdened with lots of rules, they will stop playing and that will also be a loss for the platform. Correct me if it's wrong.
Of course, so that the rules are not boring, the rewards must be consistent.
But what I do believe is that like every game there should be levels of difficulty and the higher the difficulty, the greater the rewards.
I agree that yes, there can be many users and you have to attract them, but that differentiation must exist to encourage climbing to higher levels and then the desired quality can exist.
But obviously a platform like Steemit will not reward users just for being present. I don't know if I explain myself.
If you are rewarded just for being there, it will be difficult to control spam, plagiarism and poor quality.
absolutely agree with you. We are not reward just to be present in steemit, but we must try and publish the post as best we can.
This is what has been missing recently at SCA 😝.
Yes, I think SCA so far is consistent.
It is good to incorporate some improvements.
And surely if you are very good you will get good grades and good rewards 😊
In general I agree with you 100%, the more rules are implemented the more users will be left out, that is to say a lot of users with great potential in the academy would be left out of it, therefore I want to say that it would be a great opportunity,
If all the options would be optional and not mandatory, this way they could get more interactions,
I really do not know the motivations of the mods and admins and what really benefits them within the ecosystem if having fewer users in the community or more users to support them. it would be a matter of them talking to us clearly and that way we can understand them better because I really do not understand this part is deeper. many people talk about that there are users who want to follow the rules but this is by necessity and not because they want to say the motivation then this is not democratic if not an imposition so I said in my post we should reach a means of voting where all active users can express their true decisions democratically.
There is no advantage at all for the admin if many users stop following SCA or stop using steemit, in fact it will be a loss for steemit because it will bring bad effects such as negative issues, not fully decentralized and so on. I personally also don't know exactly why we have to enforce all these rules. Indeed, the rules are necessary, but they do not have to burden all members of the community.
Let's hope, the team listens to all our complaints.
it is really strange what happens with enforcing rules to participants or content creators. as we really strive every day and commit to the community to do high quality work. i really agree and would like clear answers to follow the rules from the administrators. what they really need or it suits them so we can work together for the benefit of both. i talk about attracting more people i have the potential and can bring hundreds of people but i don't know what they want so i'm at stop.
In reality we all have one goal, which is to see this platform continue to grow and become more and more successful. Maybe it's just a different way. I believe the team wants that too, but in their own way. We just need to try harder and give our opinion if it is accepted.
You know, the previous steemit owner @ned never wanted to listen to feedback and criticism from the community, but the current steemit team I think is very involved with the community and wants to listen to complaints from its users.