I absolutely agree with you: the deep love for the beauty of nature also and especially includes the archaic, hostile areas. But - I think that the eyes are also more than just marginally involved in the love for a person. Of course, I don't mean that we love someone because they conform to ideals of beauty. No, but I am sure that eyes (their way of looking at me, reflecting sorrow, shining funny,...) or hands (well-groomed, smooth or wrinkled, with or without a ring,...) play a big role when I love. A person's movements, their posture, whether they look me in the face or down to the ground - I see and love all of this with my eyes. If I couldn't see, I would probably love the same person because I would experience their presence differently. But it would be more difficult for him because one of my sensors is missing...
Beautifully said.
I think he wouldn’t mind one bit if that were the case… Love is strengthened even more by imperfections, I guess?
P.S. I found out late that a new round of Wordle had dropped. Fortunately, there was one left - and you even tried to take that one too 😄
0.00 SBD,
0.12 STEEM,
0.12 SP
Oh, it started with a mistake, but I thought... ;-)))
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
It's fine :-D
I used up all my attempts though...I'll be sure to lose.