You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: [생각] 최전선에서 싸운 병사에게 상을 내리지 않으면 누가 다음 전쟁에 앞장설까?
It seems that you do not understand the original article. Maybe google translate did not work well for this case.
What you said is basically irrelevant to what I wrote, so I am not sure whether I could reply to you properly.
But I can tell you two things from what you wrote:
it is really funny that people like you assume what other people think, while in many case, including this one, what you think is completely imaginary.
It seems that you don't even know what's going on. Ignorance itself is not a fault, but please mind your own business.
Perhaps you are right on the translation. They don't typically work too well with the way most people talk/write. Maybe that is the case with Korean. In any case, I do make an effort to understand and be understood where others may not. I also adjust my writing style to a manner which I hope will be better understood by the translator. So it's possible that both instances are distorted.
You are always free to correct me on what you think instead of dodging the conversation. In absence of contradiction, I have no reason to correct myself.
Do I not own Steem? Is this post not recorded on the Steem blockchain? The answer to both of those questions is "Yes" therefore, it is my business.
It is funny that people like you assume what other people think, while in many cases, including this one, what you think is completely imagined.
I have followed the situation. I participated in a number of the forums between Tron and other Steemians. I have read posts from you, and others whom you support, in which you tried to justify the freezing of accounts after you criticized the freezing of accounts in the past. I have seen you try to justify taking away the ability of an account to stop a mistaken transfer. Based on your previous statements, these attempts to justify those actions seems to go against who you are. It is hypocritical.
So you were talking about completely different subject. Now I understand what you are trying to say.
I am tired of these issues related to 22.2 cabal, but it seems that I have not talked to you directly, I will give you a benefit of doubt and briefly write one more time.
In general, I do not agree "freezing" someone's account.
I believe that people who violate the "rule" first do not deserve to be protected by the "rule".
For example, if some soccer players use hands to shoot the ball saying that they have "reasons" for it (and cannot provide any concrete evidence except some situational/subjective ones), I think that the other team might also use hands to counter them.
But the analogy doesn't really fit does it? The two situations (22.2 and 22.8888/8) are not the same. The ramifications of the two are also not the same, especially regarding the @Darthknight situation. Steemit never had one of their funds stuck in a powerdown that they didn't want. Whether @darthknight is @blocktrades or not is irrelevant. Whether he is a liar or deceiver or not is also irrelevant. The bottom line is that this vengeance quest which you support is very unpopular, and I believe that in your heart, you also know it is wrong. You and others who helped bring it about are worthy of any criticism you receive.
oh, and stop assuming what I would feel and I would think. It seems that you simply don't know.
For example, if it were "vengeance" as you incorrectly imagine, I would have frozen other attackers/spammers instead.
Your own statements indicate that it was vengeance. Do you play soccer with your hands? Is it not against the rules? Do you believe in playing by the rules? If all it takes for you to go against your own standards is for someone else to do it first, that is an indication of vengeance as a motivator. Is it not?
it seems that you don't get it. If the other party starts using hands in a soccer game, it is not a soccer game anymore.
It seems you don't get it. The use of hands in soccer is part of the game. It's written in the rules. There are consequences for it. If you set out to play soccer by the rules and then choose not to play by the rules because someone else has chosen to do so, you lack integrity.
At this point, I am not sure whether you are trolling. But I will reply (benefit of doubt).
Darthknight situation is different in a way that he himself did change the route.
Did anyone ask him to do it? No.
And I still have no idea that how you, and some others, state as if you are a representative of darthknight, or as if you know what exactly he does or thinks. For example, how do you know whether it was intentional or not? It is already clear that he is a liar, so how do you know bittrix is not his account?
This liar did not say anything recently, so I do not know what his intention was or he wanted to do. That's it.
Whether it was intentional or not is irrelevant. He has stated that he wants to stop the transfer now. That's it.
Does he want to stop the transfer? Yes
Evidence: He expressed this desire in his post.
It doesn't matter if it is his account or not. He wants to stop the transfer. It doesn't matter if he is a liar or degenerate or not.
I already wrote a long article regarding this, and lots of others offered contacts to talk.
As far as I know, there was no response.
It is really funny that he becomes silent (probably b/c his lies got caught) but people like you become.very vocal as if you are the representative. I wonder where these people were when much more fund got locked without any notice (22.2).
There were plenty of people who criticized 22.2. Some of those same people maintained their integrity in the face of 22.8888 and were rewarded with betrayal.
I don't need to be a representative in order to speak out. I have an opinion like anybody else. I just call it like I see it.