You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 저스틴, 구 증인, 스팀 파운데이션과의 미팅 간략 후기
Justin's answer was very concise, and it was as if he knew what the Korean community had previously claimed and would like to answer accordingly.
if google translate did a good job, i think you got this right. From what we seen and heard, Justin has absolutely no idea how steem blockchain works and his answers about downvotes were what you want to hear and about power down is what he wants. is that possible he does not know, and that is ok, but should not then comment on it.
i know you had problems with downvotes but check this account, scroll a bit down and open the comment section. that would be steem blockchain with no downvotes. if you are ok with that, well then i can't say to you anything more https://steempeak.com/@indicate
In this case, google translate did a very nice job. I am still not sure whether he is determined and confident (that he pour down resources to make that happen) or he simply wants to tell us what we want to hear.
The anecdote you provided is one of the best examples that supports pro downvotes. I believe that almost everyone agrees that spam, criminal activity, extreme self vot should be regulated.
Personally, I do not expect downvote feature to be removed, and would like to push to the direction where if someone downvotes, he should state the reason. This will likely reduce downvotes and in particular, will make auto-downvotes and downvote trails difficult.
i am 100% sure he has no clue how steem works, but i still have no idea what his plan really is.
Seen that in the talk, it is something that would be easy implemented and tested to see will it improve how people feel about downvotes.
His plan is to sell his frozen STEEM as soon as possible.
could be