Why Can Trump Attack Greta Thunberg But We Can't Mention Barron?
Why Can Trump Attack Greta Thunberg But We Can't Mention Barron?
Audience Question: Why can't Barron Trump be mentioned, but the right can attack Greta Thunberg?
Do you agree?
▶️ 3Speak
)
I see you are still misrepresnting the truth.
Barron is a child with the interests of a child, he has not involved himself in political matters.
That is not true of Greta. She may only be the tool of the globs (people like you) but she chose to play a role.
If you have a child and others find out who where and other details, once your own child is attacked, then you might realise how evil you are. Till then, you are part of a group who are losing and will within your lifetime only be a part of history. I wonder how you will survive then.
Basically, because of you, I am attacking 3Speak everywhere I can, on and off the web. I am only telling you as I did not want anyone to think I am trying to do so in secret.
Why attack 3speak? Don't shoot the messenger.
He complains about people censoring free speech on the platform.
Then, gets all offended when 3Speak let's people say whatever they want.
It's kinda funny really.
Are you telling me we should not shoot YTube, FB, Twat, Gogl, who all are censoring and furthering the interests of the marxist globs against us. Who all are furthering, not the interests of the normal moslem, but of the extremists, against Christians?
Who they promote shows their bias and in that sense, there are no messengers among the tech corps - same with Steemit, we only have a small degree of freedom here because they made the mistake of decentralising it. Otherwise, take a look at the top SP holders/witnesses. For instance, they are all against those who are anti-vaxx (in other words, they do not believe parents have the right to make an informed decision)...I know this from personal experience as I got flagged for making such posts....which is one of the reasons you can see my comments and posts do not earn me even one cent, for I refuse to allow them to censor me (they say there is no censorship on steemit, but they are playing with words, for there is 'effective' censorship through flagging until the post is greyed out. Anybody who has any marekting experience knows it is so).
In the last few days I have been looking at the 3Speak posts, hoping to find one that represents the interests or preferences of the majority of people, not just those of the elite, and did not find one. That I am meant to consider a freak occurrence, just coincidence?
PS: It seems to me you have chosen the same avatar as mark; the captain of Firefly. Coincidence?
lol
if the avatar you use really is a photo of you, it makes me very happy, for it means you are young enough to live to see the day when all the truths you do not want to see are real and you have paid for it.
Actually...
that is what is called an oxymoron. There are and never have been any communists who believe in peace. All they believe in is that everyone thinks like them, or else they kill them. Have you read any books written by Chinese people who survived under Mao - while losing all their family and friends because of questioning something about communism? Have you heard the voices of pain from china right now, of those who are having their organs removed for the State to sell them?
You think you are open-minded, but the truth is, you have been brainwashed and cannot see the truth. That can only be excused in a child!
read a book dude, you're dumb as hell.
To be called dumb by someone like you, is like being called dishonest by someone like Hillary.
Thanks.
Feel free to read, its important to know what you're talking about.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-anarchist-communism-its-basis-and-principles
thesnarkysnark?....lol.
sounds like a pale version of markymark doesn't it?
Yeah, it never ceases to amaze me the creative things people come up with to be funny.
I don't blame you, there's obviously something going on behind the scenes at 3Speak. When I first started on here you got rewarded pretty good by them....so either there's been a policy change or someone behind the scene's is pulling some type of censorship against those debating the opposite view of David.
Thanks.
Funny, I have two responses, one from a 'sunlit' which is positive, willing to question and debate, and one from a 'demon' who is negative, only capable of farting a 'lol' - seeing as to how so many dems are now openly satanists, it makes me wonder....
Coincidence?
amazing
Not as amazing as valuing what you have to say over money.
Well because barron isn't the President, he didn't run for anything, he didn't set himself up to be a target.
Greta wants to make big speeches and yell how dare you, she can handle the reaction.
Barron didn't consent.
Greta did.
Got it? Shaking my head.
I pretty much have to agree with the guys below and all those you nay say giving you the same opinion. You'd have to be pretty naive not to believe that using Barrons name to take a jab at the family doesn't reflect negatively upon the family in the press and lead to ridicule at school for Barron. He never asked for himself to be used as a public display let alone be used as someone's political football.
Barron isn't a political figure nor a media figure. He has no intention of being in spotlight nor he should.