The problem was that how to prove that the

The problem was that how to prove that the outside world exists a lot of things on the round Around this problem the problem is how to go beyond our consciousness that's how much I remember that stated that in general it is taken to prove that the Outside world exists before the punishment is proved that it looked pretty Funny he correct me if I'm wrong But it looked like this so there is one hand anasu here is the second hand it exists so it is proved the existence of at least two objects externally if we can to show the existence of two objects can not prove the existence of 3 5 and so on. 1 is not enough And of course this is the Muravan evidence which is very much perceived by many as an anecdote so philosophical joke since a paradox like a day so I am not this this proof was thought of as a breakthrough to common sense Rasul calculated that all the former philosophy is a cluster of misunderstanding misunderstanding and everything it was extremely complicated by the philosopher himself just gas sense he even cops out there because when we talk about something to prove We imagine that we imagine the series of formulas of many o many bukovok many many signs of logical formulas and the like things when we are speaking at the proof of the outside world of the fact that within the framework of cognition a certain theory will be formed which we inevitably need Prove that the existence of an external world is necessary date and time as forms in the quality Club