RE: The Reduced Author Rewards of The Economic Improvement Proposal is Moronic and Unfair
If you want to decrease self-voting, then punish self-voting. If you want to get investors, create better and easier to use software. Go and innovate. If you want to decrease bid-bots, then come up with a solution that does that, but DO NOT think that just because someone reads our work, comments and re-steems entitles them to half our reward. It will not make the network better, it will make the network worse.
Very well said my esteemed @distantsignal. :)
Curators as a class have not earned the privilege of that much reward.
I totally agree with you on this mate. And certainly I also dropped my fair bit of opinions everywhere about this balderdash matters.
As an aside, I want to be frank about how I feel Curators being placed on par with creators.
Yeah! "Curators" c-u-r-e=i=t=o=r=s...
Ha, I even also have written a 'bilingual' post about my views on "Avid Curators" a month ago. And just to complement that last .gif in your article here, let's just add one more eloquent Pic to the EIP pot.
Oh! so, you are a Curator eh?
Ha! Thank you! I love that image. If only I could make my feet actually do that.
Just with practice mate. }:)
Everything with practice 'should' be achievable. LoL
BTW. The level of support for this is bit surprising and not. Who could imagine that a proposal offering more money to people who LITERALLY DO LESS than creators would be popular. It’s so weird!
Sarcasm Beam is set to kill here.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Oh! lazy people outnumber us tenfold!!
And if it happens, that they also have some stake in the unfair game. Multiply that laziness tenfold more.
So, they know it better!! Tsk Tsk };)