You have 9 people with a perfect score of 10, how do you choose 4 of them for you to suggest to @steemcurator01? A reasonable explanation would certainly avoid the other 5 from feeling not really good. If there is no, it's like saying, "You are good too, but, sorry, it's not your day."

I've been making statistical reports on SLC operations for weeks so I know enough to know you're not the only one doing this, but I haven't asked. Maybe now my curiosity is unstoppable.

I know, if possible, we want all Steemians who have done well to get more ‘love’, especially through the fingers of steemcurator01 or @steemcurator02, I also understand that you are only given 4 slots. This really puts you in a difficult position.

I remember some time ago, when I was taking a cryptoacademy class. When it was close to the announcement of the top 4 (summary), @kouba01 came and edited his comment by lowering my score, so that I didn't make the top 4 and put someone else who had better work where I was. Well, I guess he did that to avoid a question similar to the one I asked you above. I don't mind what he did, because I trust his judgement on who the top 4 are and that is explained by the scores.