If Animal Flesh and By-Products are "Healthy", Why Don't People Only Eat Those?

Honestly, who thinks or actually does eat only animal body parts or their other property (eggs, milks, etc.)? Are people really healthy if they do this?

Think about it. If eating animals is actually healthy for us as "omnivores" or "carnivorous" animals, then a diet in only animal flesh would be the healthiest, like it is for carnivores. This is evidently false for the herbivore, frugivore, foiliovore animal body types we humans match the most.

No one eats only animal flesh. Clearly eating only meat or animals products is detrimental to health, otherwise people would be doing it to prove how healthy dead bodies, corpses, cadavers and carcasses is...

Is we are "meant" to eat dead body parts for our optimal survival, why don't supposed human "carnivores" enjoy eating raw meat?

Something doesn't add up.

When we think about it, when we look at comparative anatomy, our conditioned way of living, then our conditioned beliefs about diet come into question more.

If we were carnivorous by design, we would want to eat dead bodies raw, and actually be physically designed for such a task of killing other animals and eating raw, which we aren't.

The human species needs to wake up through a process co collective self-analysis. We are living and acting out of ignorance.

We can eat a variety of plants and be healthy and thrive, so if animal products are required and actually healthy, people should be able to eat a variety of dead body parts or other animal products to be healthy and thrive.

Reality shows us a lot if we want to pay attention to it :)