Scientific Studies make CLEAR that Cellphone and WIFI Microwave Radiation can cause Cancer, DNA Damage & Death.
There is already much research that shows that cell phone technology is directly associated in the causality of cancer, brain damage and DNA damage. For those who do not yet know, the cell phone technology that many of us use daily was never really properly tested for safety. In this post I intend to expose some of the research that has shown that this is the case and some of the related stories from the cellphone industry too.
'Safety testing' is out of fashion with today's corporate interests
As is common, the greed driving the corporations involved caused them to completely fail to ensure correct testing was done and initially the only testing was done was to ensure that the technology did not overheat the user (as would be the case with a microwave oven). What was not publicly tested was the possibility of more subtle injury through use of the technology, including the risks of causing cancer, DNA damage and other related damage in our bodies.
The extent of the conditioning surrounding this topic is huge - just look at how many people queue up to buy cancer causing cigarettes to get their fix - EVEN AFTER BEING DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER - so when it is understood that similar habitual behaviour is involved with the use of phones as is involved with chemical addictions, it can be seen that even when informed of the problem, many will ignore it and choose to live in denial until they suffer the consequences. It appears that it is extremely important that we look closely at this topic to find out whether we really want to risk our long term health for short term technological convenience.
In my own case, i sold mobile phones as part of my job as a teenager and had zero idea of the health risks involved - but once i learned of the risks and realised they were very real, i smashed my phone and have not owned one since. I also do not use WI-FI at home and instead the house is wired for ethernet internet connections.
Research Media
The following video demonstrates the results of a study that used high tech equipment to visually display in realtime the way that wifi and cellphone radiation penetrates human bodies and brains:
This next video is a presentation of the results of a scientific study that showed a connection between the wireless phone technology and brain damage, DNA damage and cancer in rats who were exposed to them:
Further links
Please also review a couple of less scientifically minded links that demonstrate the situation in ways that are a bit easier to consume for most of us:
Former Nokia Boss Crippled By Cell Phone Radiation Warns Public of Danger
Nokia’s former chief technology officer (CTO), Matti Niemelä spent 10 years developing technology used in your beloved Smartphone devices before he fell ill as a result of exceptionally high levels of accumulative exposure to cell phone radiation. Now he’s warning consumers about the health hazards attributed to microwave radiation absorption – it’s to late for him, but it might not be too late for you or your loved-ones!
Cell Tower Radiation Prevents Garden Cress Seed Germination in Danish Experiment
In 2013, a ninth grade experiment for a national science fair found remarkable proof of radiation damage from Wi-Fi routers that was replicated by a peer review study. Wow! So, what did both experiments show? Garden cress seeds placed near Wi-Fi routers failed to germinate.
Options for Shielding?
There are several ways that we can protect homes, offices and bodies from Microwave Radiation and while they are not always cheap, it is at least possible to be protected if we are for some reason unable to relocate to a non built-up area that is somewhat free from such pollution. I wrote on this in a previous post here.
What do you think? Am I missing something?
Let me know in the comments below. For now I am happy that I smashed my own phone several years ago and haven't owned one since!
Love!
I can also say that the very large organisation I was just working for had 0 wifi active in any of their facilities and significant shielding that rendered Cellphones useless. Below is an interesting addition to your post.
Thankyou, yes - I forgot about that one.
The thing that concerns us is the creepy 5G.
Yes, that will probably pose a huge problem for many more people who suddenly 'discover' they are 'electro hypersensitive'.
Anyone who has ever worked with microwave technology (I did) has to know this is slowly harming us and everything else in nature. I just went through a 2 1/2 year battle with my electric provider because they wanted to install a microwave emitting smart meter on my property on the wall adjacent to my 92 year old mother's bedroom. She has a pacemaker. I lost because you cant fight big business and big money. An engineer for the company told me the meter's output was well within government safety standards. So was asbestos and leaded gasoline. They are installing these meters to get rid of the meter readers and also to spy on what you are doing in your own house as far as electric usage. As if we aren't spied on enough! They are slowly killing us with this stuff and people are oblivious. It's all about corporate profits and selling info for marketing purposes nothing else. If you live in an area with an opt out provision get that cancer causer off your home.
I have seen cases where policy enforcers literally forced people at gunpoint in america to allow access to their own homes to have these devices fitted - so much for free will and liberty. in Britain there is no forcing and we opt out and can install our own meters to prevent such problems.. I would look to leave USA as it is basically a testing ground for social engineering and mind control. :(
I am astounded that the UK would have an easier policy to deal with. This all started in the UN. It is a global initiative. I found a company that sells on eBay that has the paint and other things to shield your living space from all this RF pollution. I purchased a meter from them and it works great. See link below.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Gigahertz-Solutions-HF32D-RF-Microwave-Radio-Frequency-Meter-XLNT-ENTRY-LEVEL-/311611105349?epid=736612985&hash=item488d782045:g:eKQAAOSwt7pXNNeF
OK, yes, I was working with a company specialising in these types of products for a while. I linked a post above to my earlier post on the topic of shielding.
Britian is quite 'anti free will' in it's governmental policy in many ways and it is not seen as a threat to the empire builders because, well, they mostly control and dominate Britain.. America however is different in that it has more of a tradition of fighting tyranny and so presents more of a threat to the tyrannical and thus is more of a target.
I hear you. The royal family is a questionable group though.
yes, that's what i am pointing at - among other things.
The only thing I would add is the court cases in LA last year that said "cell phones cause radiation." :) Very well conveyed I am upvoting. :)
Thanks for your input. :)
Why would a corporation or government ever tell us about a danger if there is money to be made? It's sick what these aristocrats get away with for the sake of profit.
Sadly I already know that there are eugenics agendas at play whereby some groups are looking for whatever mechanisms they can find to 'soft kill' as many humans as possible. Combine Cell phone radiation with Chemo'therapy' and further radiation as 'treatment' for the cancers and you have a multi-stage death machine pure and simple!
If anyone cares, I have muted @i-repost for trolling in this thread.
gg retard
But seriously, whoever believes this shit has a screw loose. Mentions scientific studies yet doesn't post a single one. Brings up the old CTO of nokia's issues, when it has nothing to do with modern cellular phones and is likely bullshit anyways. Complete retardation along the lines of the anti-vaxxers and flat-earthers.
I linked a long presentation that fully explains a specific study. I also have a long list of other studies I can supply if needed - but if you haven't actually reviewed the one I did provide then there isn't much point. I have long discussed such topics online and I can see and feel a mile away when someone is demonstrating confirmation bias.
I doubt you understand what confirmation bias is. The presentation you posted doesn't show any actual danger to the general population from modern use. Go on and post the studies you have then lol
The presentation goes to decent lengths to discuss the function of animal tests with regards to cancer and the ethical problems with testing on humans directly. The risks to population are clear unless you deny aspects of reality.
Here's a link with numerous published studies highlighting the risks: https://www.ureka.org/pages/view/15412/the-closer-you-are-to-cell-phone-towers-the-sicker-you-are
Introducing the expert forum, Davis explained how the conference would cover multiple aspects of electromagnetic fields and health from the recent research evidence on carcinogenicity to medical applications to regulations and policy. Dr. Davis made the following points. The outdated adult head models used to evaluate cell phones today were developed in 1996 and do not adequately protect the millions of current users who are children. Recent studies from U.S. government and Italian researchers to be presented at the conference strengthen the body of evidence indicating that electromagnetic fields could cause and/or promote cancer. Peer reviewed research also indicates adverse effects to sperm and reproductive system development. Experimental research indicates adverse effects on neurological development.
"I can see and feel a mile away when someone is demonstrating confirmation bias."
Posts a person who has an entire career based on wifi concerns and has been criticized heavily in the past for defending people accused of scientific fraud and is known to not understand basic physics.
Oh boy
? I have no idea what you are talking about here. My entire career is mostly in Software engineering and has nothing at all to do with wifi concerns. Your final claim here is incorrectly written and cannot be reliably parsed using English grammar rules - perhaps you can provide more detail to support your claims, because you appear to be pulling them out of thin air.
Lol, I wasn't talking about you. We all know how an argument of sources between us would result in me posting a respectable and well-made study, and you posting a shitty source that's tangentially related from the list you got off some nutcase's blog.
But just one question, do you also believe vaccines are bad?
Lol you're the one denying aspects of reality. You also seem to forget that just because a study done that claims something, that doesn't mean it's true. After all, there was a study that claimed vaccines caused autism and that obviously not true.
The studies you posted are quite frankly dogshit and would likely never be published within a respectable journal at this point in time. Now this brings me to the next point, the vast majority of studies you posted in that long info dump that looks like someone copy and pasted the results of a google search for "wifi cause cancer????" are from the early 2000's and pretty irrelevant or non-reproducible today.
I know that this might be hard to come to terms with, but you might just be a walking stereotype.
Anyone who diligently uses the scientific method understands immediately that when someone's rebuttal to a long list of studies is to label them 'dogshit' and to belittle them without even a shred of counter evidence provided - then that someone in question is outside of integrity and balance. Throwing in casual ad hominem attack is another clue as to the lack of integrity present.
If you can demonstrate why the many studies published are 'not relevant' today then go ahead - but several of them are from 2013 and cellphone towers and phones have not undergone a significant enough transformation in that time for your claim here to be even vaguely true.
When you can respond here with substance we can discuss your claims. However, continued borderline trolling will result in you being muted, not because your position is so amazingly powerfully true, but because you are wasting everyone's time here with unsubstantiated claims that demonstrate ego imbalance that wants to compete instead of simply sharing understandings that can lead to co-creating beneficial outcomes for all involved.
"unsubstantiated claims"
woo lad
But seriously this is on the same level as believing vaccines are bad. Legit stupidity.
Do you realize you're being a real dick? Steemit isn't the place for it.
There are scientific studies that proves wifi signals which are radiation and cell phones as well as cell phones and towers can cause cancer it was even ruled in California last year that smartphones cause cancer. :)
I know all this yet I still have WIFI. I do turn it off occasionally but my other half uses her kindal so does not have Ethernet connection. When I move in a few weeks its Ethernet all the way.
But it's the phone god I'm hooked, no I not to bad really. Just were we are there is not phone signal so yer need wifi to use Whatsapp. God its all coming out, but this is society's control. I do need to be in touch with people and without a phone it difficult, not for me but my mother likes to be able to phone ect. Na its got to change @ura-soul Ethernet has been on my mind recently so it a go in the new place. Get a land line maybe ... or find another platform online that can be used but other to call.
The only problem is your still getting zapped bu next door and every other house within 100 meters.
I worked with a guy in a care home he was 56 and ha been a businessman. He use his phone a lot and got brain cancer right about his ear. It was so so sad he still though he could walk and was living with people in their 80's 100's his life was shit!
yes, there is a documentary called 'mobilized' which shows photos of people with phone shaped tumors on the side of their heads. Whatsapp is one of the worst apps ever invented from my perspective -there are lots of alternatives. a small laptop or tablet with a usb->ethernet adapter is all that's needed to replace phones etc.
I recommend moving out to nature to get away from the pollution, but the next best thing is to look into shielding for the home - it's expensive though.
I do live in the country my village only has a couple a hundred houses but unfortunately all of them have WiFi. My new place is also a little village, and I'm going to make sure I uses Ethernet :)
WhatsApp ... I know it just as i said no signal. I think my new place will have signal so whatapp can take a back seat. "a small laptop or tablet with a usb->ethernet adapter is all that's needed to replace phones etc." could you sen my more please!
I'm not 100% sure what you are asking for at the end of your comment here because it was mis-spelled. I think maybe you are asking for more information about the usb->ethernet adapter?
the issue is that many small internet capable devices don't have ethernet connections, so you are forced to use WIFI with them.. However, some of them do have USB ports and that means you can convert the USB port to an Ethernet port using an adapter.
Here's one that will work with mobile devices and mini USB ports: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/UGREEN-Ethernet-Adapter-for-Chromecast-Chromcast-Ultra-Micro-USB-to-Ethernet-/292082714955?hash=item44017c894b:g:YXAAAOSwuLZY7IAv
Hi sorry yes the D button on my computer is intermittent. I was asking about info on phones line through the usb I think you mentioned?
OK, yes - I gave you a link already to the kind of device I am talking about. You connect the device to a USB socket on your tablet/laptop and then plug an ethernet cable into it - which you can then connect to a router which connects to your phone line.
You Received an UpVote from @worldclassplayer. To Learn More, See DetailsHere
No it doesn't.
Thankyou for your substantial insight.
No problem friendo