RE: FaceBook removes all doubt: Vaccines are dangerous!
""I could go through and counter the majority of the one's she was posting.""
So your claim isn't actually able to be proven. You just announced that you 'could', if you wanted, but don't want to. I thought as much.
I propose that you cannot actually counter the majority successfully.
Ok fine, then I'll submit one to you. How bout an easy meme with a quote from this vaccine marketing specialist, which actually goes right along with what Senator Pan keeps saying.
Can you make sense of it for me, and explain how all those toxic ingredients, combined together, are rendered harmless?
Then after that we can move on to you proving that your claims about "Vaccine Induced Herd Immunity", are actually a real thing. You see, it isn't, but I would love for you to prove your claim about 'anti-vaxxers' being "protected" by the herd.
Here, another explanatory meme, with crayon underlining to help with what I am looking for in the proof of your claim that counters actual science:
The first one's going to be easy...the second one I'll have to study...I'll be back.
Why would you have to study it if you already made the claim that Anti-Vaxers are being protected by the vaccinated herd?
This tells me that the first won't be easy for you either. But, by all means, if it is that easy to prove all those toxic ingredients/materials contained in the vaccine are, rendered harmless when combined, I can't wait for your proof!
I could wing it on generality of the old "measles party's" theory of gained immunity....which you'd lose based on an opinion there were still more risk involved as it required participants to be infected...which common sense would tell you the more people infected the higher the mortality/consequences of serious life threatening complications....but common sense doesn't prevail with some so I'll go dig and see if I can find some documented evidence somewhere before laying the ground work for this debate.
The other lies on whether once introduced into the body it stays in the body which it don't otherwise people like me who eat a lot of tuna would have long been dead by now....but I'll make sure I bring forth more than just that, like stated dispensation, how much stays in vs how much dissipates, etc.,
You could "wing" it and you would be incorrect. Just as incorrect as, everything you have said so far.
Currently you are all over the place. The Logical Fallacies are flying, and you literally have zero ground to stand on. So far you have avoided proving, any, of your claims.
Don't speak of "Common Sense", unless you are willing to demonstrate that you have some. Common Sense doesn't require a plethora of logical fallacies.
Let me be even more clear than before. -VACCINE INDUCED herd immunity, is not the same as a "Measles party", which is going for 'Natural' immunity. The ONLY way to achieve "Herd Immunity" is by -Natural- immunity.
Clearly you do not even grasp the difference between Ingestion vs Injection. You should really, really look into that first. Cytokine Storm and all that.... I'll give you a hint, when you EAT tuna, you are not INJECTING it ;)
I haven't forgotten about you....still researching stuff.
I find my last few days very busy with the holiday, holiday shopping and loads of fricken dishes...lol. I have had some time to look into it a bit and it's been very interesting, going to have to be much more in depth then I originally thought as I have to look up a lot of medical terminology so I fully understand what I am reading. I've book marked where I left off but there's some interesting stuff coming out of France on a French study done there in the last couple years that I am looking more into.... I will be back...maybe something will fall in your favor but I have to look at it from all the angles.