MYTH: Cell phone use causes cancer. FACT: some probability.steemCreated with Sketch.

in #health7 years ago

In my line of work, hydrocarbons (O&G), I was taught that when dealing with radioactive sources (for at least at the very basic level), there will be two ways for not getting sick: (a) for extremely high radioactive levels do not get nearby the source at all – leave this work for professional handlers trained for this kind of jobs. (b) for radioactive low levels do not expose yourself for too long to these devices - and if you must, do it for the minimum period of time as possible.

cellradio.jpg

You see, radioactivity exposure depends on both time of exposure and intensity of radioactive level. Still, as a priority, stay away from these sources.

What does this have to do with the use of cellular phones, cellphones, mobiles, etc?

Making calls, exchanging messages, checking your mail and sending documents or taking photos and sharing them on social networks, are examples of the multiple tasks that the cell phone facilitates. However, its utility was questioned when it was stated that its use raises the risk of suffering from different types of cancer. To know the myths and realities in this subject, keep on reading.

1)Myth: Frequent cell use causes cancer and that is for real!
Fact: The International Agency for Research on Cancer, which reports to the World Health Organization (WHO), classified the electromagnetic fields produced by cell phones as possibly carcinogenic to humans. However, another report in Denmark later revealed that it had not found any signs of danger after an extensive study that took into account the results obtained after analyzing more than 350,000 users. Despite this, WHO has kept the alert and has informed that it will continue studying the subject. In sum, one can speak of probability, not of certainty.

imageradio.jpg

2)Myth: The cell causes cancer because its electromagnetic fields damage the tissues.
Fact: Mobile phones communicate with each other by emitting radio signals over fixed antenna networks known as base stations. These radiofrequency waves are electromagnetic fields like X-ray radiation, for example, but unlike them, they do not represent a potential hazard to humans.

It is known that the main consequence of the interaction between the radioelectric emission and the human body is the heating of the tissues. In the case of frequencies used by cell phones, most of the energy is absorbed by the skin and other surface tissues, so that the increase in temperature inside the skull or organs is insignificant and cannot be considered a factor of risk for developing cancer in the brain.

Although scientists have noted the adverse effects that radio waves have on the brains of animals, it is not clear yet what these data mean for humans.

samll brainradio.jpg

Recall, for example, that studies on the human brain are limited to the use of non-invasive technologies, so they cannot open the brain for a live analysis, such as those used for the development of brain maps: magnetic resonance imaging, Electroencephalography or tomography, among others. These research support tools provide extensive information on brain activity, but lack the accuracy and sensitivity of those used for the same purpose in animals.

3)Myth: Cell phones cause cancer because people are always exposed to high levels of radiofrequency waves.
Fact: A cell phone only transmits power when it is switched on; the user's exposure to the radiofrequencies drops rapidly as the distance increases with this device.

BAYRADIO.jpg

This means that whoever handles the device within 30 cm or 40 cm of your body, for example, when writing text messages, surfing the internet or when using it in the hands-free mode, is much less exposed to radiofrequency fields than those that make calls in a traditional way.

Also, the use of the telephone in areas where there is good reception also leads to a decrease in the level of exposure, as the device thus transmits with use of less power.

4)Myth: It is impossible to reduce exposure to cellular (phone) energy.
Fact: In addition to using "hands-free" devices, a user can reduce exposure to the energy of the cell phone if the number of calls and their duration decreases.

cordless.jpg

5)Myth: Using a cell phone is a health risk.
Fact: There is no scientific study or test that demonstrates cause-effect relationship between the use of cell phones and the development of cancer in the brain. The only certainty, however, is that it is a real problem when used while driving, with or without hands-free function, as this practice significantly increases the risk of an automobile accident, which occurs with any cel. model. While driving your brain must at all time using 100% of its capacity to understand your surroundings and prevent incidents and accidents.

funnyyradioc.jpg

NOTE: recall the marketing campaigns, 50 or so years ago, pushing for smoking products; they went as far as saying that it was good for your throat. Now almost on the verge of disappearing. And it was all for the money. Perhaps same is ongoing with cellphones, an industry that makes millions of USD’s every second – does it harm us in any way? So far, some probability … will see in 50 or so years.

References:
http://www.who.int/en/
https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-187918,00.html
https://www.iarc.fr/
http://www.fisherclinic.com/
https://www.nist.gov/pml/radiation-physics/radioactivity


Are you into this type of topics, plus others like science, technology, human state, politics? Keep the conversation alive …. UPVOTE & perhaps, RESTEEM, and in addition you might want to click on the FOLLOW for further interesting posts. I do appreciate your comments,

@indepthstory

Sort:  

Like so many topics only time will tell. Thanks for the article, well done!!!

hey very much appreciate your note. Keep in touch.

I appreciate you keeping the facts straight on this topic! I'd rather protect myself from these types of radiation now (within reason), and like you said we will see in 50 years if it was worth the effort!

..and if I may, we might want to recommend certain better ways to manage our cell phones to friends family colleagues etc... most probability cels will not go ..so we'll have to make the best of it...rdgs.

With most devices now being wireless to cut out cable clutter, this issue will continue to grow. My concern is that wireless WiFi gadgets operate on a 'free' frequency bandwidth, but with so many gadgets operating in tandem over a fixed bandwidth range, signal interference is inevitable, so manufacturers of these gadgets break the rules by implementing dynamic range power, emitting higher power signals, to get their gadgets working (at the expense of polluting signal strength of other gadgets). if this goes unchecked, signal noise levels turn into dangerous pollution levels. Maybe after a few generations, it will be clear what the effects of current EM radiation has on our current generation - Sadly, being technological guinea pigs is all we are left with!

Did not had the opportunity to read about this; when bidding for frequencies it is a first come first served ... and to fulfill promises there goes power to the sky .. rgds.

wifi frequencies are free, they are considered free for scientific study. radio/tv frequencies are not.

for clarity, please cite or references the links for the images you're using.

txs for the note will be doing so going forward. rdgs.

This article is very clearly, opinion with explanation should make people understand

Good job @indepthstory

txs...for now as mentioned all say NOTHING SURE perhaps lots of $$$ to be made 1st ... hummmmm

I am also interested in this subject. Just seen on Canadian TV channel that each phone manufacturer is required to inform the users about potential risks or radio frequency exposure.

wow is this a post of yours can you resteem this in any way...?

More science less bullshit :D Good content.

LOL it is a matter of $$$ ..lead by big conglomerates which in turn are managed by corporate greed .. no problem with the business ..still place some note advising of any harm IF IT IS latent in the equipment…

Hey got a nice post here looking forward to see more on other interesting topics

also Id like to nominate you in a curation group im in

This gem of a post was discovered by the OCD Team!

Reply to this comment if you accept, and are willing to let us share your gem of a post! By accepting this, you have a chance to receive extra rewards and one of your photos in this article may be used in our compilation post!

You can follow @ocd – learn more about the project and see other Gems! We strive for transparency.

Thank you for the comments I sure appreciate it. Looking forward to keeping this conversation ongoing … happy Steeming…!!!

Great
I entered you for todays competition. Youll see in a few hours if you made it into the compilation

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.25
JST 0.039
BTC 94309.43
ETH 3309.61
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.28