You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: FaceBook removes all doubt: Vaccines are dangerous!
Believers I have given up arguing with online include vaxxers, warmerists, vegans, flat earthers, libtards, and fluoridationists - been there, done that, can't be arsed anymore...
http://www.frot.co.nz/design/sifty/conspiracies/
I wasn't responding to that angle of the debate. Science is an ever involving process, your prior chart brings into question that very fact (this one to but lets stick to the other one for time being as I don't need more stuff to research right now) that it is misleading to try and prove unscientific date against scientific data. In other words, as I responded to VC's chart provided, it is wholly inaccurate scientifically to state people back in the 1800's were dying of a specific cause as the science was not there to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. One strong case in point was scarlette fever, it cannot be conclusively confirmed that outside of breaking out with a red rash that all scarlette fever deaths were accurately accounted for as there was no way to test back then if those who did not break out with a rash deaths were attributed to scarlette fever. I could probably take your chart, research it and conclusively come to the same conclusion about some illnesses.
Since the only science necessary to document mortality of these diseases is whether or not someone died or suffered permanent injury from these causes, that level of sciencific understanding was undeniably competent to provide solid proof of those metrics.
It's not rocket science.
Hardly.