You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Hardfork Update - Curation being added back to comment rewards, revised curation and reward curves for both posts and comments
Perhaps. I think we'll see relatively quickly and can move on to our next round of blockchain whack-a-mole^H^H^H^Hiteration
Exactly, that's why we should try one substantial change at a time, so we can actually understand the effects before pulling out the hammer yet again.
With essentially every proposed hard fork so far (at least those implementing rule changes), the feedback from the stakeholders and community has strongly favored fewer changes being pushed out together as one big package. Sometimes that is impossible or impractical, but here we have a case where there are two completely independent major rule changes (flattening the reward curve and splitting the pool) that can easily be rolled out, voted on, and evaluated separately. I see no good reason not do so.
@smooth (nested reply) I would agree except that we don't have unlimited time. We have to compress the timeline as much as we can.
@smooth Fully agree with 1 change at a time wrt important items such as power and funds distribution; absolutely the only way to find out what the results are. @sneak When rolling out multiple changes a time, what are your ways to determine what are the causes/effects?
@edje By talking to our users, same as always. :)