I went through this a couple years ago when I was shopping for my first pistol. Through friends I was able to try a couple 1911's in .45, a .357 revolver and a couple Glock variants in 9mm. Of all the handguns I tried, I actually liked the ergonomics and shooting consistency of the revolver the most, but for various practicality reasons, reloading being primary among them, I decided against getting one for self-defense. I liked the ergonomics of the 1911 the least, although being such heavy guns, even in .45 ACP I didn't notice recoil being much worse than the Glock 9 mm, and they're pretty easy to shoot accurately.
I ultimately settled on the 9 mm and got what many consider to be a Glock knock-off, the S&W SD9, but it's known for being one of the least expensive guns out there, it's super reliable (most reliable semi-auto I've ever fired), and accurate (for a handgun) if you can get over the heavy trigger pull. Some range time and I was able to quickly work around that heavy trigger.
I also liked the price and availability of the 9 mm cartridge, along with its proven track record in police, military and self-defense use. I also like the fact that many rifles have been coming out recently chambered in 9 mm, which would make it a good candidate for inexpensive and low-recoil target shooting at the rifle range without needing to carry multiple calibers of ammunition.
Everyone has their own criteria for firearms, which is why it can be hard to say, "this is the best option for everyone." I plan to discuss pistol-caliber carbines in a future post, and one big advantage can be not only caliber compatibility, but magazine interchangability, depending on the pairing.