Gridcoin Liberation Front: 1st voter subsidy summary
Fellow Gridcoin workers!
Following our recent call for action, below is the summary of the first Moo! Wrapper voter subsidy. We thank all those who contributed to the GRC-LF fund.
Next distribution snapshot will be taken on 31.01.2018 20:00 GMT.
Please vote on the Moo! Wrapper poll and send your fund contributions to the following GRC address.
SBHDKwsZnD8eTdZmVGPGiWJr5ZAc9F51iN [view on block explorer]
If you have trust issues send small amounts. Every little drop counts!
Follow us on this steemit account to keep informed
Snapshot date (1st): 23.01.2018 20:00 GMT
Total fund balance: 192 GRC
Total voters: 94 (79 workers)
Total "Remove" voters: 36 (27 workers)
"Remove" vote share distribution:
---------------- Top 75% ----------------
s4mmie 2005849 0.404 0.404
NeuralMiner 845201 0.170 0.574
orbitriber 297315 0.060 0.634
N 252463 0.051 0.685
donkeykong9000 249957 0.050 0.736
--------------- Bottom 25% --------------
Each voter below received 8.70 GRC
---------------------------------------------
W 229089 0.046 0.782
cautilus 206544 0.042 0.823
LaptopCluster 197309 0.040 0.863
AntD 166426 0.034 0.897
denravonska 108408 0.022 0.918
ILikeChocolate 90878 0.018 0.937
noxcivi 60569 0.012 0.949
ZamaZa 53977 0.011 0.960
Cmdrd 43069 0.009 0.969
Dudebaker 34739 0.007 0.976
Harders 32170 0.006 0.982
den777 18401 0.004 0.986
The0retical 13855 0.003 0.988
MaratMukhametshin 13562 0.003 0.991
Oppergok 11637 0.002 0.994
Roberto 9381 0.002 0.995
AlphaTango11 7378 0.001 0.997
cpuzombie 4194 0.001 0.998
lexieric 4087 0.001 0.999
Amarynth 3729 0.001 0.999
Gregan 2688 0.001 1.000
30104 498 0.000 1.000
ITT: Litterally buying the removal of a project from the whitelist.
explain the difference between
a)buying X amount of GRC from a someone an exchange for Y amount of $ and voting with them
b)paying Y amount of $ to someone with X amount of GRC to vote with them
A -> They purchased the GRC to vote with themselves.
B -> They're using less GRC than A to summon a greater possible vote weight than via A.
It's not appropriate to demand a voting intention when paying, it if it was rewarding all parties then that'd be fine.
i understand that people tend to think within the current paradigm, however you should ask yourself the overarching question:
if some people are willing to sell their voting right where do you get the authority to withhold them from doing so (by banning/shaming/restricting etc.)?
You're missing the point I think... @cm-steem is saying you are trying to buy the removal of a project, and you have straw-manned that argument into
So, yes, you are trying to buy project removal. That being said, I think Moo! Wrapper should be removed.
well, saying that i am trying to buy the removal (via the 8.7 GRC that i sent back to grc-lf) is not an argument. it is a fact. my point was why are you guys acting like it a shameful/immoral thing? i can give you the scientific philosophy arguments, or i can tell you if you remove a project you get (1/(n-1))-(1/n) increase in your daily gains, or i tell you that seeing this project go is worth 8.7 grc to me and i am willing to give it to you. i don't see any problem with any of this. i would like to hear moral philosophy arguments to the contrary, not the usual, omg they are buying votes slogans.
Because free speech? I can voice my disapproval, it's not an attack.
free speech is the condition/right that enables you to do what you are doing. i was more interested in what makes you act like you do. in other words why are you disapproving. of course you can say "because i can" but that's not really informative and mature
I'm doing no such thing, I'm just posting on Steemit about my own views on the matter. There's nothing you can do to stop such a practice & nobody can ban/restrict you on Steemit. I do think it's better to buy your own vote weight, because that'll create buying pressure, lol.
I really hoped the "movement" would die over night... Now I have to shower again.
I have to say as stupid as it is I do enjoy the way this account writes. However my "vote" -have not actually voted btw.- this time aligns with the goal of the initiative. However I find it to be immensely disingenuous in nature. It really is not afraid of money being able to buy influence -rather it is jealous. "Kill the aristocracy so that we can BE the aristocracy" just isn't a pursuit that I can support.
And no this is not the same as the campaign finance issue, because when it comes to an actual vote in a democracy if it is a halway-decently functioning one you won't get away with creating fake IDs to vote for too long... And when it comes to GRC the fake ID is completely legit.
I wondered where that transaction came from!
Congratulations @grc-lib-front! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPHow is Dr. B?
glad to see this was not a scam, funny to see that i am also below the 25%, don't need the subsidy though, will send it back to the fund once my wallet syncs...