It does seem crazy, doesn't it?

I always wondered about how it happens that when a repressed people thought it was wrong and unjust to be forcibly repressed, could then justify doing the same when the tables were turned.

When the repressed get the opportunity to control their own lives better, why do they not strive to make sure it happens to no one again, instead of turning around and doing the same thing to others that was done to them. Doesn't that mean they are just as guilty and just as much of the problem as anyone else ever was?

If you believe it is not right for other people to do, then it is not right for you to do it either. You either believe the concept is ok or you don't.