Socrates is satisfying with general reasoning about knowledge as a virtue, without giving a systematic account of this knowledge and without indicating a metaphysical and anthropological basis for it. It is difficult for him to determine what is good.
Socrates is satisfying with general reasoning about knowledge as a virtue, without giving a systematic account of this knowledge and without indicating a metaphysical and anthropological basis for it. It is difficult for him to determine what is good.
Indeed, and so it is for everyone. To which you can only conclude that we know nothing.
Right?