Sort:  

Oh my god yes. The general population doesn't understand Megapixels don't equal better pictures. I don't know how many times I'd be talking to a client and they just ask me: "So how many megapixels does your camera have?" I had use a lot of willpower to not facepalm right there in front of them. I wish camera bodies would focus a lot more on improving dynamic range until it hits at least 24+ stops.

So true! In fact dynamic range is the thing that I would love to have - I often find myself having to underexpose shots to make up for it! HDR just always looks fake. I have been told that Medium Format cameras give you more but they are so expensive that I doubt I will ever be able to try one - plus I would rather downsize than go up in size.

I agree, HDR usually looks fake, but sometimes it's a necessary evil. :( I usually only HDR if dynamic range in the shot exceeds the dynamic range of the camera, and then I try to tune the output to look more natural if possible. Although, I'll be honest sometimes my HDR doesn't succeed in looking as real as I would like. Here's one HDR I'm proud of though: https://www.facebook.com/A.Furmanczyk.Photography/photos/a.497540865676.269323.33771525676/10150298063105677/?type=3&theater

That's how it should be done as it doesn't look overdone! I think if an HDR looks like an HDR then it has gone too far.

Thanks man. ^_^ Yes, you're right, HDR is a powerful tool that must be used responsibly. When it's overdone, it's ugly as fuck.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.22
TRX 0.20
JST 0.035
BTC 90550.33
ETH 3203.67
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.15