You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Odds and the Facts: A Steem Casino Comparison
Great post guys, missed out a lot lately but I would suggest adding volume to the next report. For example, CUPZ volume is low (wish it could be better) while KryptoGamers ballooned after MagicDice exited and SteemBet went dead.
It's difficult to look at volume, it's impossible to tell if some accounts are getting paid to play and every operator would deny. One thing is for sure, Cupz is definitely not paying people to play or running a bot network. The idea is to make this post more standardized and make people aware that not all games and operators are as generous to gamblers.
The better odds games will last longer (safer divs?) as players who are more aware will be attracted to them. If you are a big player once you try a game with better odds, it's hard to want to play something that is worse.
Ok, we can always refer to StateOfTheDapps, DappRadar or the third party dApp monitoring sites, they monitor the contract and transaction data almost in real-time. It may not be perfect, but volume (fake or not) definitely needs to be accounted for with a margin of error.
ie. With its current volume how long before CUPZ divs begin?
*Just an example, not looking to debate or knock CUPZ. Anyone can view the data from the sites that monitor the contracts directly or in some cases the explorers, I just think it would be a nice metric to add to your reports. But, guess not 🤷🏽♂️
Posted using Partiko iOS