You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: THOUGHTS
Yes, you are right that it would demotivate authors. It would suck for authors to get only 50%. My first sentence was regarding engagement. I don't think 50/50 will increase engagement because if money is your incentive, it is still better to shit post and earn an entire 50% of the rewards than comment/upvote and only get a small piece of 50%.
IMO, even if you made it 100% curators and 0% author (I don't recommend this at all), people will only engage for the money and upvote at random or just find the highest payouts to upvote.
Probably so..I agree with you on this one.
It would in turn counter all that we are trying to be and promote as a community-Quality content. It's not worth the risk. The truth is, there are a few bored and probably greedy high stakeholders that want to disrupt things, keep us distracted from what is most crucial at this point, SMT'S.
Money motivated engagement is so hypocritical, whatever happened to doing things from the heart?
If people realize that they need each other for more than just money, you will get people doing things from the heart. If there is no need to bond with others for anything other than financial success, then people will tune out and not waste their time with other people. This is essentially what is happening on this blockchain but things are changing very rapidly.