Funny how this expert dog also thought the door leading to another dog was so interesting that the officer had to jerk his chain, literally multiple times, then patting him to move on (showing dog does not have autonomy but is a tool of the officer). Then they move to an area where the camera and accused cannot view the dog or officer which then leads to said officer stating that said K9 has indicated back to said unbiased K9 officer (completely impartial officer who has no ability to influence dog, ahem ... unlike when he had to distract said animal from a door leading to another dog). Now this “obvious proof of criminality” (a dog/officer team who is unreliable at best and 100% biased at worst) gives officers being filmed having lied and harassed accused for a speeding (9mph) violation that they can now search his vehicle without the drivers permission. Following this unusual chain of events the officers find in a secret hiding spot multiple various amounts of different controlled substances that were in a container, I assume, that would not be obvious to the naked eye, then assume all these events are normal and standard operating procedure for a 9mph traffic violation. Sounds much more like officers on video had vested interest in not being made to look like they were wrong, deceptive, liars, arrogant, unfriendly and generally confrontational (which they were filmed being) making sure this accused person does not leave the scene a free man and instead prove themselves apt by arresting the captured man and his property because ... “muh dog”. This would be an incredibly easy way to frame a person who say, oh idk an authority figure would want to impose their will on, then besmirch the character of said accused based on dog testimony, and possible other influences. The entire thing looked like a setup and takedown. They located Adam with first stop, finding him inside mode of travel not under his name and then following that up with a second officer who now is stopping him for different violation on same road by same department of police. Who here thinks that officer could not get the dog to give an indication? Who thinks officers do not plant evidence? Who thinks officers are 100% honest and have no ego? Thought so. This was a takedown. You can’t fool a Marine all the time. You might get us at MEPS but once we hit the ground at the Recruit Depot we become acutely aware of people fucking us over!