You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: @freedom Can Single-Handedly Boost the Price of STEEM and The Market Ranking
The account is a passive income account renting delegation.
The facts are:
- There is significant stake
- There is desire to protect that stake
This is why the account votes on witnesses. @freedom doesn't need to do that for any other reason and shows that the owner has taken a conscious effort to protecting this stake.
I would like to know what you think of this publication.
Witnesses can be trusted.
power down of its @steemit account
I like the concept of the community creating software upgrades to STEEM. It would bring more decentralization to STEEM and cut reliance on Steemit Inc. There is one major flaw in that thinking. There is no one with the programming skills to write the software.
In essence, cervantes is asking for a voluntary tax to pay for a outside support. I think that most people here want to avoid taxes. I can't imagine that people will volunteer to be taxed.
Freedom doesn't just vote on witnesses, you need Freedom's vote to be a top 20 witness.
Good way of acting like the community is voting in witnesses while Steemit/Ned or one their close associates is basically picking witnesses.
Some witnesses don't need @freedom's vote to be in the top 20, but I agree that many do.