How is pointing out places where your platform contradicts individual self-ownership “shitting on” activism? It’s the foundational axiom for all libertarianism.

If you think that either myself or Larken have got no point why don’t we formally debate it? Lots of market demand for that here, as voiced by many folks already on the formal debate invite post I made. I think we should look out for individuals who have knee-jerk reactions to honest criticism.