The interesting thing about removing the need for intensive agriculture is that it's something that simply HAS to happen. It isn't a choice given that our available land mass simply cannot produce the volume of food required to sustain our growing global population.
The frustrating thing is that none of our governments want to get on board with this type of food production. There's way too much money tied up in existing food production practices. It's all very aggravating. Where's a progressive government when you need one? Oh.. right.
our growing global population.
not for long
if you believe the numbers.
why would you do that?
none of our governments
governments are insane.
why would you rely on them to do anything?
If lemmings can do it, so can people! That graph is proof "in the pudding!" Imagine if vert farms actually do work out! The father of necessity is creation. good stuff
That's an interesting prediction about our population and is quite possibly accurate. It would be similar to the standard population movements of any population of animals.
And governments sadly have a large influence as to how we progress as a society. So until they are removed from the equation we're better off attempting to control their direction.
governments ReAct.
be ProActive.
go around them.
I flew in an airplane once and just glanced out once in a while and saw woods and more woods and more woods. Arable land is everywhere unless you wish to pretend it can't be touched for unrelated causes and conditions.
you ought to fly west...like from St. Louis or Chicago to Seattle or Portland....lotta empty land out there.
The 48 contiguous states are larger than the country of India which supports over a billion souls.