Liquor HAS NO FOOD VALUE.
Liquor has no nourishment esteem and is exceedingly restricted in its activity as a healing operator. Dr. Henry Monroe says, "each sort of substance utilized by man as sustenance comprises of sugar, starch, oil and glutinous matter blended together in different extents. These are intended for the support of the creature outline. The glutinous standards of sustenance fibrine, egg whites and casein are utilized to develop the structure while the oil, starch and sugar are predominantly used to create warm in the body".
Presently plainly if liquor is a nourishment, it will be found to contain at least one of these substances. There must be in it either the nitrogenous components discovered essentially in meats, eggs, drain, vegetables and seeds, out of which creature tissue is assembled and waste repaired or the carbonaceous components found in fat, starch and sugar, in the utilization of which warmth and compel are developed.
"The peculiarity of these gatherings of sustenances," says Dr. Chase, "and their relations to the tissue-delivering and warm developing limits of man, are so positive thus affirmed by investigations on creatures and by complex trial of logical, physiological and clinical experience, that no endeavor to dispose of the order has won. To draw so straight a line of boundary as to utmost the one completely to tissue or cell generation and the other to warmth and drive creation through normal ignition and to preclude any power from claiming compatibility under exceptional requests or in the midst of deficient supply of one assortment is, without a doubt, untenable. This does not at all refute the way that we can utilize these as discovered points of interest".
How these substances when taken into the body, are acclimatized and how they create constrain, are outstanding to the scientist and physiologist, who is capable, in the light of all around discovered laws, to figure out if liquor does or does not have a sustenance esteem. For quite a long time, the ablest men in the restorative calling have given this subject the most cautious study, and have subjected liquor to each known test and explore, and the outcome is that it has been, by regular assent, prohibited from the class of tissue-building nourishments. "We have never," says Dr. Chase, "seen yet a solitary recommendation that it could so act, and this a wanton figure. One essayist (Hammond) supposes it conceivable that it might "some way or another" go into mix with the results of rot in tissues, and 'in specific situations may yield their nitrogen to the development of new tissues.' No parallel in natural science, nor any confirmation in creature science, can be found to encompass this figure with the areola of a conceivable theory".
Dr. Richardson says: "Liquor contains no nitrogen; it has none of the characteristics of structure-building sustenances; it is unequipped for being changed into any of them; it is, thusly, not a nourishment in any feeling of its being a valuable operator in working up the body." Dr. W.B. Craftsman says: "Liquor can't supply anything which is fundamental to the genuine nourishment of the tissues." Dr. Liebig says: "Brew, wine, spirits, and so on., outfit no component fit for going into the piece of the blood, solid fiber, or any part which is the seat of the rule of life." Dr. Hammond, in his Tribune Lectures, in which he advocates the utilization of liquor in specific cases, says: "It is not self evident that liquor experiences transformation into tissue." Cameron, in his Manuel of Hygiene, says: "There is nothing in liquor with which any part of the body can be fed." Dr. E. Smith, F.R.S., says: "Liquor is not a genuine sustenance. It meddles with sustenance." Dr. T.K. Chambers says: "Obviously we should stop to respect liquor, as in any sense, a nourishment".
"Not recognizing in this substance," says Dr. Chase, "any tissue-production fixings, nor in its separating any mixes, for example, we can follow in the cell nourishments, nor any proof either in the experience of physiologists or the trials of alimentarians, it is not brilliant that in it we ought to discover neither the anticipation nor the acknowledgment of valuable power."
Not finding in liquor anything out of which the body can be developed or its waste provided, it is alongside be analyzed as to its warmth delivering quality.
Creation of warmth.
- -
"The main regular test for a drive delivering nourishment," says Dr. Chase, "and that to which different sustenances of that class react, is the generation of warmth in the mix of oxygen therewith. This warmth implies essential compel, and is, in no little degree, a measure of the relative estimation of the purported respiratory nourishments. On the off chance that we look at the fats, the starches and the sugars, we can follow and assess the procedures by which they develop warm and are changed into fundamental drive, and can measure the limits of various nourishments. We find that the utilization of carbon by union with oxygen is the law, that warmth is the item, and that the authentic result is drive, while the consequence of the union of the hydrogen of the sustenances with oxygen is water. On the off chance that liquor comes at all under this class of sustenances, we appropriately hope to discover a portion of the confirmations which append to the hydrocarbons."
What, then, is the consequence of analyses in this bearing? They have been directed through long stretches and with the best care, by men of the most elevated fulfillments in science and physiology, and the outcome is given in these few words, by Dr. H.R. Wood, Jr., in his Materia Medica. "Nobody has possessed the capacity to identify in the blood any of the common aftereffects of its oxidation." That is, nobody has possessed the capacity to find that liquor has experienced burning, similar to fat, or starch, or sugar, thus offered warmth to the body.
Liquor and decrease of temperature.
- - -
rather than expanding it; and it has even been utilized as a part of fevers as a hostile to pyretic. So uniform has been the declaration of doctors in Europe and America with regards to the cooling impacts of liquor, that Dr. Wood says, in his Materia Medica, "that it doesn't appear to be worth while to involve space with a dialog of the subject." Liebermeister, a standout amongst the most learned givers to Zeimssen's Cyclopaedia of the Practice of Medicine, 1875, says: "I since a long time ago persuaded myself, by direct tests, that liquor, even in similarly huge dosages, does not raise the temperature of the body in either well or debilitated individuals." So well had this gotten to be known to Arctic voyagers, that, even before physiologists had exhibited the way that liquor decreased, rather than expanding, the temperature of the body, they had discovered that spirits diminished their energy to withstand extraordinary cool. "In the Northern areas," says Edward Smith, "it was demonstrated that the whole avoidance of spirits was essential, keeping in mind the end goal to hold warm under these unfavorable conditions."
Liquor does not make you solid.
- -
In the event that liquor does not contain tissue-building material, nor offer warmth to the body, it can't in any way, shape or form add to its quality. "Each sort of force a creature can produce," says Dr. G. Budd, F.R.S., "the mechanical force of the muscles, the compound (or stomach related) force of the stomach, the scholarly force of the cerebrum collects through the nourishment of the organ on which it depends." Dr. F.R. Remains, of Edinburgh, subsequent to examining the question, and evoking proof, comments: "From the very way of things, it will now be perceived how outlandish it is that liquor can fortify nourishment of either kind. Since it can't turn into a part of the body, it can't thusly add to its strong, natural quality, or settled power; and, since it leaves the body similarly as it went in, it can't, by its deterioration, create warm compel."
Sir Benjamin Brodie says: "Stimulants don't make apprehensive power; they only empower you, so to speak, to go through that which is left, and after that they abandon you more needing rest than some time recently."
Noble Liebig, so far back as 1843, in his "Creature Chemistry," called attention to the misrepresentation of liquor producing power. He says: "The course will seem quickened to the detriment of the compel accessible for deliberate movement, yet without the creation of a more noteworthy measure of mechanical constrain." In his later "Letters," he again says: "Wine is very pointless to man, it is always trailed by the use of force" while, the genuine capacity of nourishment is to give control. He includes: "These beverages advance the change of matter in the body, and are, thus, gone to by an internal loss of force, which stops to be beneficial, in light of the fact that it is not utilized in defeating outward troubles i.e., in working." at the end of the day, this awesome scientific expert attests that liquor abstracts the force of the framework from doing helpful work in the field or workshop, to purify the house from the pollution of liquor itself.
The late Dr. W. Brinton, Physician to St. Thomas', in his awesome work on Dietetics, says: "Cautious perception leaves little uncertainty that a direct dosage of brew or wine would, as a rule, on the double reduce the most extreme weight which a solid individual could lift. Mental intensity, precision of recognition and delicacy of the faculties are all so far contradicted by liquor, as that the most extreme endeavors of each are inconsistent with the ingestion of any direct amount of matured fluid. A solitary glass will regularly suffice to bring some relief both personality and body, and to diminish their ability to something underneath their flawlessness of work."
Dr. F.R. Dregs, F.S.A., composing on the subject of liquor as a nourishment, makes the accompanying citation from an article on "Fortifying Drinks," distributed by Dr. H.R. Enrage, as long back as 1847: "Liquor is not the common jolt to any of our organs, and thus, capacities performed in result of its application, have a tendency to weaken the organ followed up on.