It doesn't. And you assume I am residing in the US. Regardless, this "attack" was started by @libertyteeth and cohorts harassing @berniesanders, the greatest Democratic elect in recent years.
Btw, your link showing the outdated Computer Abuse law makes it very clear there must be some damage or loss incurred. If I were taking part in anything, it would just be frustrating, but not cause damage.
Ad Profit loss, through traffic conversions lost, data for the down time lost, monthly fees paid, security fees paid, domain time paid, hosting time paid. Let me know Liberty. My sister practices law abroad, also passed the NY bar so I'm sure she knows someone in each state, most services allocated to digital crimes. I don't know man, sounds pretty much like a possible felony if it's deemed to be a under the patriot act articles pertaining to attacking a website that is attempting to protect innocents from internet fraud...especially if it's international. Then it's a no brainer patriot act violation. With an admission of guilt....well that doesn't matter actually, you lose all rights to a fair trial by violating the patriot act.
edit: Well I'll be damned, I wasn't sure, but possible charges of terrorist activity, which could very well lead to funding terrorism through attacking US servers. How that makes sense logically....? Don't ask me, ask Bush and Obama.
Legal Mumbo Jumbo: This is only my opinion, make of it what you wish. What does this mean? It means it's not advice nor recommendation to either buy or sell anything! It's only meant for use as informative or entertainment purposes.**
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030 this exact activity falls under US code 18 1030 . Interesting admission of guilt in this post.
It doesn't. And you assume I am residing in the US. Regardless, this "attack" was started by @libertyteeth and cohorts harassing @berniesanders, the greatest Democratic elect in recent years.
Btw, your link showing the outdated Computer Abuse law makes it very clear there must be some damage or loss incurred. If I were taking part in anything, it would just be frustrating, but not cause damage.
Good luck with your class actions.
@nijeah you understand that is not really Bernie Sanders, don't you? It is just a guy who took that as his username.
Ad Profit loss, through traffic conversions lost, data for the down time lost, monthly fees paid, security fees paid, domain time paid, hosting time paid. Let me know Liberty. My sister practices law abroad, also passed the NY bar so I'm sure she knows someone in each state, most services allocated to digital crimes. I don't know man, sounds pretty much like a possible felony if it's deemed to be a under the patriot act articles pertaining to attacking a website that is attempting to protect innocents from internet fraud...especially if it's international. Then it's a no brainer patriot act violation. With an admission of guilt....well that doesn't matter actually, you lose all rights to a fair trial by violating the patriot act.
edit: Well I'll be damned, I wasn't sure, but possible charges of terrorist activity, which could very well lead to funding terrorism through attacking US servers. How that makes sense logically....? Don't ask me, ask Bush and Obama.
Thanks, hit me up at [email protected]. The rest of this will happen off-blockchain.
Add to that the 500+ spam comments (with lots of vertical whitespace) this user is leaving on @haejin's posts, to make other comments less readable.
Perhaps not specifically actionable in and of themselves (the spam comments on @haejin's blog) -- but definitely evidence of a malicious mindset.
Or perhaps he just left his keys on the sidewalk and someone else is driving his account, LOL.
Legal Mumbo Jumbo: This is only my opinion, make of it what you wish. What does this mean? It means it's not advice nor recommendation to either buy or sell anything! It's only meant for use as informative or entertainment purposes.**
Right, and your FOAF wrote that for you.....doesn't really work that way son.