You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Day 5 of being flagged by BernieSanders
fulltimegeek is an abusive account? I am an abusive account? The numerous people getting flagged by these sockpuppets are abusive accounts? Why and how?
fulltimegeek is an abusive account? I am an abusive account? The numerous people getting flagged by these sockpuppets are abusive accounts? Why and how?
Get on chat and meet these people. All your fears will be dispelled.
You didn't even bother to verify if anything I said about fyrst was true, you simply flagged me and told me to leave, because you don't like me, why should I take your advice over these people, I see their parasitical behavior of self voting, htooms, fryst, contentjunkie, they have large, very large, stake and they extract wealth from the system through voting on their own stuff, and seek to drive people away with flag wars, threats and shananigans like blacklist, asshole, iflagtrash, hebrew, bcc, and other sockpuppet accounts, while defending people who slander others on the regular like matrix and his trollish remarks, but I am to take your opinion of these people after you stuck your nose in none of your business, didn't follow with any due diligence of my claims and sought to marginalize them to "finger pointing blame game" as if lying, manipulating people through antagonistic worthless 0.03% votes and supporting anonymous blackmail/extortion is just "finger pointing blame game" and they are not real concerns.
I have no interest in meeting any of these people. The facts are that in his introduction post htooms has not disclosed anything about himself, he self votes and flags fulltimegeek nonstop, so what are my fears again when I am observing things and reporting here, to which you say that my eyes are deceiving me.
That's unfortunate. Real communication can overcome so many misconceptions. Talking via text is too limited to really understand who these people are. You are drawing many wrong conclusions simply because you are not meeting these people in a real social setting.
I like how you devalue words typed as "unreal communication, or false/fake communication", as if a word typed is not real communication and too limited.
so why not go on a chat with fyrst and htooms :| I don't get your guy's crap, you've managed to shit all over the floor and walls all 10 of you flaggots
well suit yourselfs, it's your shit after all, go be kids all year if you want, then wonder why 80% are bots here :D shame for those other 20% that actually care for something more than buttons and blocks,
It's more for bernie, but with the amount of time you've wasted you get the "credit" of my comment, thanks :) maybe
What are you saying?
Why do that to begin with? htooms says I suck fulltimegeeks dick, great, what the hell would I want to chat with someone that spews that shit?
Yeah, what's this mean? Your guy's crap? Who's crap, can you name some names to offer more direction? Who's the flaggots?
Who's the other 20%?
Huh? directing that at bernie I suppose, then give your opinion on him by saying amount of time wasted, but whats credit mean.
No, to your why, no I won't chat with people slandering and hypocritical anonymous "My community" narcissistic individuals that refer to themselves in third person. I have no reason to trust or believe anything that comes out of a hypocrites mouth, lest a liar and a fraud.
well I don't mind what you do, spend your time how it best suits you, I just don't see the reason behind pulling all the blocks of data and making a huge ass post on a really "shit" topic, I'm almost done since this is going too far for too long, it's annoying seeing a flag war every week, it's annoying seeing the fingerpointing posts, so to answer everything from the bottom up
most of the comment on flaggots and shit on the walls was for bernie since he's the main flagging culprit, still there are many people that do(flag) it so it's "you guy's crap" (smooth|htooms) (smooth and abit| the world :D) bernie vs too many to name 4-5 at least naah at least 10-20 people many many flags have been thrown around
people that actually do something and care, the surfers marly and creator for instance, maybe , whatever at leas 500 people are actually actively engaging and socializing, the 20% are the part of the authors, that contribute and give good ideas, and the curators that actually read and engage on a social level, not just upvote, good post, silence at best
And finally yeah I would like to have people say if they have multiple accounts, but seriously if you can basically "debunk" your whole post in one minute of hearing two different voices, why not do that, "bury the hatchet" buuut whatever, flags are here to stay it seems and you are not actively engaged with dragging people through the mud, maybe verbally :D who knows you have quite an edge it seems, anyways thanks and that is why you deserved the credit, you got me to write a comment on a topic that is quite annoying to me, just for trying so hard to make your post count.
On the side, you can go through my comments and see that I engage the topic of discussion all the time, that people appreciate my contributions, again and again and again, you can see that I develop well informed thoughts and perspectives and source my material, and don't just comment for the post count, I comment to bring in my perspective and I back it up with sources and rationale, or experience, and rarely resort to voicing opinions or beliefs. I don't care what "I appear to seem like", that's your own projection onto words on the screen, it has no value besides that, anything else is conjecture and assumption, so please keep your opinion about myself to yourself as I don't extend that rudeness to you and I expect the at least a modicum of respect for the respect and effort I put into every reply and comment. You can also keep your thanks and "credit" because it doesn't matter if you aren't bothered by these things I post, or you think that the topic is annoying and therefore has no value, I would just tell you what I told whatup, you don't care, you don't care, and leave it at that because your compliment punctuated by what I consider a rude remark isn't welcomed.
I don't give a chit about post count, I made a suggestion post about a new flagging system, when I observed that hebrew, a sockpuppet account was flagging me it lead me down this path. I had exposed fyrst before for his lying fake self, so when I started looking at the collusive behavior I wanted to see where fyrst was in all of this, oddly enough he had not been on for a couple days before htooms showed up. Why did I go after fryst? Because in his introduction post htooms didn't disclose anything about himself, his whole introduction post was about his opinion on the experiment abit and smooth was running, and when I checked his very first comment that was just minutes after his account was created and he was quoting numerous people and then ended his comment by defending what he calls "MY community" it became obvious this person wasn't new on the scene, and who has the need to paint himself as some kind of community supporter? Fyrst, and who had been exposed before for antagonizing and polarizing the community with 0.03% purely gestural votes for some and 1.33% actual votes for others, while when confrunted he claimed it was because his votes were automatic, and that his voting power was recharging, obviously not:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54b2c/54b2cf152039566e763e09489e986ed6b75500de" alt="123142.PNG"
so who had this pattern of behavior in the past, of "supporting the experiment" while flagging and upvoting counter to the experiment, and on his account he had not shown any real support for the experiment outside lip service, but on his htoom alt he outright flagged for days without concern, then all of a sudden changed his stance.. now he comes in here and calls me a dick sucker and says he was going to write a post about his first month on steem, is that his first month on steem with this new account? Nothing was debunked, who knows who that is, it surely doesn't sound like someone that would call a person asking why they are flagging fulltimegeek with 4 accounts a dicksucker, or someone that would resort to petty flagging war over days for just one or two instances of flags, and expressing they don't care about flags as well, but I know a liar that will get awfully mad when he is flagged and resorts to flag wars after he lies and says he's not bothered who fits the profile..
Talking via words is what this social media is about, are they unable to be reasonable enough to cater to this platform without requiring people to turn on microphones or break communications?
Yes. Htooms has been very gracious in affording a few upvotes to me as I'm downvoted by a rogue stakeholder who is a self professed OG Bad Whale.
I enjoy watching the spectacle of him downvoting these other accounts. I have no sympathy for them at all.
Yes, because who would have thought that you'd built some kind of humanity, better to play the poor victim and enjoy the spectacle of your supporters flagging people into oblivion in efforts to drive them away while they seek to build an image of some great benefactors that gifts his power for others to use as he flags and selfvotes. Why have a backbone and call out immoral behavior, better to just play the victim while you assuage your supporters actions and hypocrisy.
You've been Bernified! WTF is going on here??
I don't have ONE problem with bernie, I called him a fuckface numerous times and I take it all back, he cares MORE about building this community than any of these scammers fakers and trolls, he is genuinely the bad og whale, but he has integrity, which neither fyr, nor htooms have any, he has principles, maybe they aren't clear to everyone but if you go back and read his comments and posts it's evident, and it's all to evident that someone that cannot hold the first principle of telling the truth has NO other principles to build on, these other charlatans will always be the problem.
Yup just as I expected: btu and hebrew, htooms sockpuppet accounts are hitting me for exposing him, classic fyrstiken move of turning on iflagtrash on command. No bother I will make threads and posts and expose all 4 accounts again and again and again.
This is what's happening:
Htooms and 3 other sockpuppet accounts are flagging fulltimegeek for the last 4 days, nonstop, the sockpuppet accounts are worth $3+K and all are flagging at 100% while self voting htooms is getting voted in between in efforts to artificially increase his rep and affect fulltimegeek's reputation even more.
Blocktardes is a fraud seeking to scam people with his very similar to blocktrades typohack account, he decided to flag me because I asked him in a thread he started saying that he's not for scamming people, why did he chose the description "leading the world of decentralized currency" to which he said: because I do what I want, including scamming people.
https://steemit.com/blocktrades/@blocktardes/my-account-make-people-confused-blocktrades-and-blocktardes
The 3 people that flagged me are all buddy buddy, or the same people, considering how they write and how similar their actions are: plagiarism and typoscams
https://steemit.com/spam/@ashlyns/all-my-accounts-for-you-steemcleaners-anyx-to-flag-abuse
I don't care about them or their petty flags sticking their nose where it doesn't belong, what I care about is htooms as there is no excuse for flagging fulltimegeek nonstop and selfvoting whales, collusive voting with sockpuppet accounts, and least of all supporting and encouraging such actions like this spineless individual seablue who benefits from this attention "i'm a victim" parade. She obviously doesn't care about flagwars and has no problem with this one, especially when all she's doing is play by play without giving explanation to why and how it came about, keep up the spectacle is what is going on.