You followed her? Not likely, I never saw a comment from you on any of her book post. What was the last post you made that had 100 Plus views? If ever. Or were you just hoping for an upvote from @transisto, at least he is honest in his dislike.
so she just copy paste her old content and its non unique for google ? then there is no point for her content its not bringing any traffic from google, even comments brings , but her content not, and she receive 100$ each post
Joined June 2017, oh my oh my that is a long time. Do you enjoy "Reading Fiction", if not you might not have seen her post. "Seriously weird man", I've been here for 4 months and I just saw the name @cranium that claimed to have unfollowed someone that I follow and I never saw a comment from him or his name and he joined in Joined July 2017. @investwarrior, first time I have seen his name is this post he also joined 1 month after you Joined July 2017. So yeah - - -"Seriously weird man" - - - that people who have only been on steemit 4-5 months have not seen all the steemit names or heard about all the steemit people. Or like the others just trying to impress @transisto?
First of all I dream transisto in my wet dreams I dream him voting me with his mega vests over and over and over , next time you want to defend something use your actual account.
I, unlike I guess most people on steemit, have only one account. I don't know who you think I am, but I am not them. I take comments as I see them. Prior to my comment to you I did check to see how long your account was active. My comment though still stands, just because you have been on steemit for a year and a half does not mean you have seen all the steem people. Like I mentioned, if you don't read fiction then it is unlikely you have seen her name. We follow who, and what we are interested in. If you have no interest fiction, (which it seems most of the commenters on this post do not follow), then you are unlikely to have seen her.
yes you absolutely can. Just as @transisto and @berniesanders can claim any bullshit they want about @michelle.gent, and others and rile people up to the point of divide and conquer. It's all here for people to read and understand and make and draw their own conclusions. I drew my own conclusion, right or wrong, a stand against one individual affecting the votes of many individuals, and those that support their activities.
I don't even need fingers to count the number of people I know on steemit, it is zero. I see people use and abuse others on steemit, just like I saw during my short stints on other social media. Actions, (as they say) Speak Louder Than Words.
Not bringing any traffic from google? Do you bring TRAFFIC from google to steemit? Her content is original content, it is from her work. So what you are saying is that since her content is "Published" elsewhere that it is not original and should not be on steemit? What about all the people like Dollarvigilanty and others on steemit that re-blog their post here or to youtube or from youtube? Are you saying their content does not deserve any rewards since it was also "Published" elsewhere? Or are you like @cranium trying to impress @transisto?
not sure who is cranium, but the point was that if its published then its not original anymore. I saw Michele published exclusive things they are okay, but old fictions what you can find in google in other sites, this is definitely not, plus here is problem of reward pool: blocktrades supports 83% of her earning, and other authors dont have this support, so there should be some curation guild for original fiction content not support only 1-2 man (+suesa) . And reblog is not great if its not original for sure.
She is making some of her work available to people on steemit to read for free. Yes you can get/buy her work in other places, and she does let the people know that it is available elsewhere should a person want to "Buy" it. People do not need to vote, or comment on blogs/post. It is up to the individual to determine if they want to vote/thus reward a content poster. So if I understand you right it is okay for me a piece of plankton or redfish to give a 100% upvote to her work, yet it is not okay for a Dolphin or Whale to do the same? I honestly do not understand peoples acceptance of the redistribution of an authors rewards into their own pockets. Look at @transisto 's blog about how much he removed and "Returned" to the reward pool from her, then look at how much money his post about that exploit made him. He returned Nothing to the reward pool, he simply took from her and gave to himself. It is the same with @berniesanders and his downvoting. If you look you would also see that it is @blocktrades wife that is supporting Michelle, as he stated in another post. But that is totally beside the point, just because he is a Whale, and has a lot of money, he can support at what ever level he feel like to who ever he feels like. Just as you and I can do the same thing.
so there should be some curation guild for original fiction content
So why only for "Fiction", why not for the Crypto post, why not for the travel post, why not for the NSFW post. Why are people only wanting to control the Fiction content and not all the other content. Is it because this is how Hitler, Stalin and Marx came into power, by picking one group, and then hammering that group into the ground by turning everyone against them. Yes lets practice what we preach against - - Divide and Conquer. - - That is what I feel @transisto and @berniesanders are doing. It is my opinion, and since I am a nobody, I can state that, because noone is going to really care what I think.
first of all you seems raging about some ideas , not about the problem . The problem is how people can find content in steemit. They can see only if post got a lot of money . So if some whale always upvote only 1-2 person and circle jerk , then new people see only this trending posts . Thats why im against circle jerk and hope steemit will lower curation reward for same person upvote and make higher for upvotes of new authors. Yes i know what bernie and transisto earn some money and witnesses votes through this flags, but at least they made this problem visible , so circle jerkers some got hurt and may be team steem will work on problem, If he didnt attack people will just abuse same strategy again and again.
She also claims to be a great movie producer :) Does not really look so great for me :). http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4849332/?ref_=nm_knf_i1
Of course, everyone has a different taste and I am sure she found her readers here on Steemit, but what pisses me off is how she is misleading people about her great talent.
I get that reposting should be punished but I’m worried we’ll end up with a small group policing Steem or even worse have two groups start downvote wars which could really hurt us(look at Burstcoin). That said we should discourage spam. It’s a hard problem with no simple solutions.
Is there a way the masses could vote to approve of such downvotes before they occur?
i dont undesrtand why they come to bug you with all this stuff
man you have so much power the must be thx you around
have a good life and keep sharing your influence the way you like
fu@k you rule
You shocked me...I thought she was a decent woman and a popular writer. To be honest, I did not really like her stories so I didn't continue to read them. Everyone has their own taste and this is clearly not my type. I do not understand why to behave like this; sooner or later it became known to all. I am for justice and no matter what level you reached. If someone behaves badly in relation to others then here is no place for her among honest people.
Thanks for the information, I stop following @michelle.gent
You followed her? Not likely, I never saw a comment from you on any of her book post. What was the last post you made that had 100 Plus views? If ever. Or were you just hoping for an upvote from @transisto, at least he is honest in his dislike.
Follow4follow laic 4 laic ? wink wink
I unfollowed MIchelle too .
so she just copy paste her old content and its non unique for google ? then there is no point for her content its not bringing any traffic from google, even comments brings , but her content not, and she receive 100$ each post
Seriously weird man I'm here for a long time first time ever heard about her :D last week
Joined June 2017, oh my oh my that is a long time. Do you enjoy "Reading Fiction", if not you might not have seen her post. "Seriously weird man", I've been here for 4 months and I just saw the name @cranium that claimed to have unfollowed someone that I follow and I never saw a comment from him or his name and he joined in Joined July 2017. @investwarrior, first time I have seen his name is this post he also joined 1 month after you Joined July 2017. So yeah - - -"Seriously weird man" - - - that people who have only been on steemit 4-5 months have not seen all the steemit names or heard about all the steemit people. Or like the others just trying to impress @transisto?
First of all I dream transisto in my wet dreams I dream him voting me with his mega vests over and over and over , next time you want to defend something use your actual account.
https://steemit.com/@krallar
This is my original account next time you are going to write an argument I really reccomend you to state your stuff in more logical manners.
I, unlike I guess most people on steemit, have only one account. I don't know who you think I am, but I am not them. I take comments as I see them. Prior to my comment to you I did check to see how long your account was active. My comment though still stands, just because you have been on steemit for a year and a half does not mean you have seen all the steem people. Like I mentioned, if you don't read fiction then it is unlikely you have seen her name. We follow who, and what we are interested in. If you have no interest fiction, (which it seems most of the commenters on this post do not follow), then you are unlikely to have seen her.
If you can make bullshit accusations like we are trying to impress transisto I can claim that I know every high reputation account in Steemit.
yes you absolutely can. Just as @transisto and @berniesanders can claim any bullshit they want about @michelle.gent, and others and rile people up to the point of divide and conquer. It's all here for people to read and understand and make and draw their own conclusions. I drew my own conclusion, right or wrong, a stand against one individual affecting the votes of many individuals, and those that support their activities.
I don't even need fingers to count the number of people I know on steemit, it is zero. I see people use and abuse others on steemit, just like I saw during my short stints on other social media. Actions, (as they say) Speak Louder Than Words.
Not bringing any traffic from google? Do you bring TRAFFIC from google to steemit? Her content is original content, it is from her work. So what you are saying is that since her content is "Published" elsewhere that it is not original and should not be on steemit? What about all the people like Dollarvigilanty and others on steemit that re-blog their post here or to youtube or from youtube? Are you saying their content does not deserve any rewards since it was also "Published" elsewhere? Or are you like @cranium trying to impress @transisto?
not sure who is cranium, but the point was that if its published then its not original anymore. I saw Michele published exclusive things they are okay, but old fictions what you can find in google in other sites, this is definitely not, plus here is problem of reward pool: blocktrades supports 83% of her earning, and other authors dont have this support, so there should be some curation guild for original fiction content not support only 1-2 man (+suesa) . And reblog is not great if its not original for sure.
She is making some of her work available to people on steemit to read for free. Yes you can get/buy her work in other places, and she does let the people know that it is available elsewhere should a person want to "Buy" it. People do not need to vote, or comment on blogs/post. It is up to the individual to determine if they want to vote/thus reward a content poster. So if I understand you right it is okay for me a piece of plankton or redfish to give a 100% upvote to her work, yet it is not okay for a Dolphin or Whale to do the same? I honestly do not understand peoples acceptance of the redistribution of an authors rewards into their own pockets. Look at @transisto 's blog about how much he removed and "Returned" to the reward pool from her, then look at how much money his post about that exploit made him. He returned Nothing to the reward pool, he simply took from her and gave to himself. It is the same with @berniesanders and his downvoting. If you look you would also see that it is @blocktrades wife that is supporting Michelle, as he stated in another post. But that is totally beside the point, just because he is a Whale, and has a lot of money, he can support at what ever level he feel like to who ever he feels like. Just as you and I can do the same thing.
So why only for "Fiction", why not for the Crypto post, why not for the travel post, why not for the NSFW post. Why are people only wanting to control the Fiction content and not all the other content. Is it because this is how Hitler, Stalin and Marx came into power, by picking one group, and then hammering that group into the ground by turning everyone against them. Yes lets practice what we preach against - - Divide and Conquer. - - That is what I feel @transisto and @berniesanders are doing. It is my opinion, and since I am a nobody, I can state that, because noone is going to really care what I think.
first of all you seems raging about some ideas , not about the problem . The problem is how people can find content in steemit. They can see only if post got a lot of money . So if some whale always upvote only 1-2 person and circle jerk , then new people see only this trending posts . Thats why im against circle jerk and hope steemit will lower curation reward for same person upvote and make higher for upvotes of new authors. Yes i know what bernie and transisto earn some money and witnesses votes through this flags, but at least they made this problem visible , so circle jerkers some got hurt and may be team steem will work on problem, If he didnt attack people will just abuse same strategy again and again.
I can tell you more, I checked her Amazon and found out that all her EXCLUSIVE content is not as popular as she claims to be. Here is an example -
3 reviews for real? 3 friends help you out - lol
Of course, after failure on Amazon, she got used to everyday upvotes from @blocktrades
And this one is from 2011:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blood-Moon-D-Michelle-Gent-ebook/dp/B006889MNE
While she writes here:
https://steemit.com/writing/@michelle.gent/blood-on-the-moon-serialised-exclusive-for-steemit-61
I am confused..
you too, mack-bot?
She also claims to be a great movie producer :) Does not really look so great for me :).
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4849332/?ref_=nm_knf_i1
Of course, everyone has a different taste and I am sure she found her readers here on Steemit, but what pisses me off is how she is misleading people about her great talent.
Congratulations @transisto! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPI get that reposting should be punished but I’m worried we’ll end up with a small group policing Steem or even worse have two groups start downvote wars which could really hurt us(look at Burstcoin). That said we should discourage spam. It’s a hard problem with no simple solutions.
Is there a way the masses could vote to approve of such downvotes before they occur?
Everyone who own Steem Power is expected to police the system. That this is not general knowledge worries me.
i dont undesrtand why they come to bug you with all this stuff
man you have so much power the must be thx you around
have a good life and keep sharing your influence the way you like
fu@k you rule
Well @transisto, it seems as if you have a few individual that are snorting around for a vote from you
You shocked me...I thought she was a decent woman and a popular writer. To be honest, I did not really like her stories so I didn't continue to read them. Everyone has their own taste and this is clearly not my type. I do not understand why to behave like this; sooner or later it became known to all. I am for justice and no matter what level you reached. If someone behaves badly in relation to others then here is no place for her among honest people.