RE: @haejin now targetted by @sadkitten
Thanks for taking the time to answer something.
Like I told you before, by selling their votes, bidbots forgo the largest part of the 25% curation reward resulting in a self-vote equivalent of about 80-85%.
Zer0hedge is not plagiarizing, it's sharing what it thinks is good and relevant content.
Why so upset? Maybe you did up-vote someone else but regardless, your equivalent selfvoting % was the highest of the platform in the last week.
Do the math and realize that you're earning ~20% more ROI than most bidbots.
Unlike the few other people who went at war with you, I never asked that you stop self voting completely. I once asked that you limit yourself to 80-90%. Just being a bit more reasonable would go a long way.
@Sadkitten only tries to enforce a cap on top self voting with it's tiny 20k SP.
Hey, do you know how many benefit from the 25% curation on my posts? Unlke you, I NEVER TAKE BIDs for the curation!
Like I said, you quit being a hypocrit, stop your bidbot and quit self paying...then we'll have a decent talk!
Hmm, I'll contact the laywers at zerohedge.com and see what they think of your reposts! More to come on this.
You keep coming at me, I'l return the same. Or just leave me alone and I'll do likewise.
No, I don't know. But the number of people is less important that the % given away.
If you self-vote before or around 30min I assume it's almost nothing.
I can't stop @sadkitten from going after anyone.
BTW it's technically impossible to be countering self-voters at any significany capacity and still being a top self-voter. So there goes your hypocrisy claim.
Silence! Hypocrit! I'm done talking with you!