You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SLC21/WK2: Mastering CPR | A Comprehensive Guide to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Student Name @goodybest
Overall Grade 7.9/10
Plagiarism Check Pass
AI Use No
| Question | What the Student Did Well | Areas for Improvement | Grading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Question 1 | The student described each CPR step thoroughly, covering essential elements such as checking responsiveness, calling for help, and performing chest compressions with correct hand placement. They demonstrated a hands-on approach with a video tutorial, making the instructions relatable and easy to follow. The student maintained a proper angle during the CPR. | The student could enhance the explanation by specifying the angles of the arms and body position in greater detail during chest compressions. Including a picture or additional visual aids for each major step would strengthen the demonstration. Additionally, they could have clarified the importance of each step in terms of physiological impact. | 2/2 |
| Question 2 | They provided modifiable CPR techniques for various individuals (pregnant women, obese, and elderly) and acknowledged critical differences in their physiological needs. The adjustments for positioning and compression depth were explained with practical sensitivity. | Expanding on the physiological reasoning behind these adjustments, especially regarding blood flow and the position of the pregnant woman, would improve the answer. The student could also detail the modifications more comprehensively and add diagrams showing positioning changes for each individual type. Additional commentary on AED use across these cases would also be helpful. | 1.7/2 |
| Question 3 | The student highlighted common CPR mistakes, such as inconsistent compression depth, inadequate compression rate, and not allowing full chest recoil, which shows they understand frequent errors. | The student could have added more depth by explaining why each mistake is detrimental, such as how inadequate depth affects blood flow. They could also have discussed corrective strategies to avoid these errors and outlined specific techniques to maintain rhythm, hand positioning, and a consistent rate, which would provide more actionable insights. Also, please check the serial number of the points, as they are out of order. | 1.6/2 |
| Question 4 | The campaign plan was well-structured with a clear goal and target audience, focusing on the general public and caregivers. Key messages about CPR importance were effectively outlined, and they planned to use social media and community outreach to disseminate information. | The plan could benefit from more specific campaign milestones, such as a timeline for each outreach phase, and ideas for engaging content creation tailored to each audience. Including a method to evaluate the campaign’s success, like tracking engagement or attendance, would enhance the structure and feasibility of the plan. | 1.7/2 |
| Question 5 | The student designed an infographic and provided a step-by-step guide for CPR across age groups. The illustration is unclear and unreadable. | The illustration is not readable; you need to take care of the clarity and resolution. | 0.9/2 |
General Feedback
The student demonstrated a thorough understanding of CPR and its adaptations for diverse individuals, presenting clear and structured answers across most questions. Focusing on additional visual clarity, details, and actionable improvements will elevate the responses further. Overall, this is a commendable effort!
Regards
@abdu.navi03
Thank you🙏 so much for the review and suggestions, I hope to be better