RE: Bloggers: Would you mind sharing 50/50 with those that upvote you?
"Self-voting and vote selling are no longer economically incentivized" so you basically want to remove freedom and implement some communist control system for what people do with their stake. That is what it sounds like. Just skip that idea. Let people have their freedom. People invested let them use their stake freely. If people want to self vote let them do it. As long as not something goes crazy. There are always extremes.
Okay so you look at people self vote. But you are completely missing the other side of how many that gives in a selfless way without any ROI focus every single second. You are basically looking at human nature and want to try to fix it. Selfish people will be selfish in any system you do. People reflect themselves. I see love and beauty on Steem Blockchain since I follow selfless people.
It's not the system we are dealing with. It's human nature. Most value for let's say dtube video creators is not coming from high Stake holders. They want to leech 50% off the big value that dtube gives to real content creators. Since the Steem share out was a mess in 2016 it will take 5 years to make things more balanced to real content creators. The real truth is majority of people are just not good content creators and never will be. So they are confused about their role here. So they want to leech 50% from people that are amazing.
I have a better solution before any radical changes are being done. First people need to wait for a niche + community system. Where people do solid content for specific niches. So everyone get's what they want. A moderator system for specific niches would be good. Narrative is trying this. At the moment most people are just derping around creating whatever. People that wants to thrive needs to find their niche and use a solid content strategy.
Radical changes ---> Usually someone is unhappy in life. Radically change something will never work. Most high Stake holders needs to find a project or something they can invest their life into. Instead of trying to leech off of content creators. Content creators have more leverage than Stake holders in the long run. Since they have limitless supply of original content.
How much comes from misterdelegation
There are a few main sources exactly. There is not enough high Stake holders for a 50/50 system. The leverage is already concentrated. The majority is content creators. Not a few select Stake holders. That will say any change would only favour a minority. Not the majority of content creators.
Currently @nathanmars is the person that has done the most to empower people after @misterdelegation
Empower 1000 accounts with 10,000 SP each would only take 10 million SP. But it's up to Steemit Inc how they want to do all of that. But 1000 real content creators would move waters. You have a middle class fixed instantly with that. STEEM sitting idle is an opportunity cost.
The more hands it's in the more upvotes --> The more it will make moves in the whole Internet. 1000 empowered creators. Leverage content creators is the biggest leverage you can have. Individual high level stake holders can never do this. Needs to come from higher ups.
In end it comes down to get STEEM into people that are the best to leverage it into higher possibilities with proof-of-brain. And not all are the same in their skills to leverage stuff. Some people can make 1 million people to follow them. So some are amazing at leverage. Others not.