On which even the philosophy Well positivist when they

On which even the philosophy Well positivist when they tried to build their own sign Yes, but at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries there was a whole series of events that led to the fact that she ceased to be under what the duet was about what I want to say. I want to say that in fact in history science we are defensible you can clearly see the periods of conditionally quiet development of science to when scientists accumulate the facts accumulate the facts before they stack for each found fact already there is Misha and one has only to correctly identify him And there are translations when scientists try with To create a new system of coordinates and heights this got the name of the scientific really that's what was told about it. Yes, as it happens in reality. Yes, that's what the structure of scientific revolutions says to it before its work. That's really not always the fact that allegedly contradicts the theory leads to the fact that we discard this theory and replace it with another as Porter demands it, but we have soup on beef talking not so much about opera perches. Although it's actually speaking, but this is what they really are but we still should probably say that the notion of a scientific Revolution as it uses in modern literature no longer belongs to that does not belong only to the kuna it is used to begin widely And not only with this value of Yes not only in Kurov's meaning it's just Kumovskaya interpretation She is one of the most famous one of the most popular one the brightest game