The Reality of Radical Feminism's Unholy Alliance With 'The State' and the Effects on Children
To All Mothers Considering Divorce,
Despite massive amounts of propaganda, the State is NOT your "savior" nor does it give a damn about "the best interest of the children". Government's own statistics below speak for themselves. Please seek ANY and ALL alternatives to exposing your children to this deliberately planned and orchestrated crime and the obliteration of your family's assets. Do not be delusional. You should know that 'divorce' is first and foremost a BUSINESS of parasites. You, your family, and your children are the HOSTS.
www.DivorceCorp.com
www.LeonKoziol.com
Credit: The Fatherless Generation
https://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/
• 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes (US Dept. Of Health/Census) – 5 times the average.
• 90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes – 32 times the average.
• 85% of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Center for Disease Control)
• 80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes –14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26)
• 71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (National Principals Association Report)
Father Factor in Education – Fatherless children are twice as likely to drop out of school.
• Children with Fathers who are involved are 40% less likely to repeat a grade in school.
• Children with Fathers who are involved are 70% less likely to drop out of school.
• Children with Fathers who are involved are more likely to get A’s in school.
• Children with Fathers who are involved are more likely to enjoy school and engage in extracurricular activities.
• 75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes – 10 times the average.
Father Factor in Drug and Alcohol Abuse – Researchers at Columbia University found that children living in two-parent household with a poor relationship with their father are 68% more likely to smoke, drink, or use drugs compared to all teens in two-parent households. Teens in single mother households are at a 30% higher risk than those in two-parent households.
• 70% of youths in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Sept. 1988)
• 85% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Fulton Co. Georgia, Texas Dept. of Correction)
Father Factor in Incarceration – Even after controlling for income, youths in father-absent households still had significantly higher odds of incarceration than those in mother-father families. Youths who never had a father in the household experienced the highest odds. A 2002 Department of Justice survey of 7,000 inmates revealed that 39% of jail inmates lived in mother-only households. Approximately forty-six percent of jail inmates in 2002 had a previously incarcerated family member. One-fifth experienced a father in prison or jail.
Father Factor in Crime – A study of 109 juvenile offenders indicated that family structure significantly predicts delinquency. Adolescents, particularly boys, in single-parent families were at higher risk of status, property and person delinquencies. Moreover, students attending schools with a high proportion of children of single parents are also at risk. A study of 13,986 women in prison showed that more than half grew up without their father. Forty-two percent grew up in a single-mother household and sixteen percent lived with neither parent
Father Factor in Child Abuse – Compared to living with both parents, living in a single-parent home doubles the risk that a child will suffer physical, emotional, or educational neglect. The overall rate of child abuse and neglect in single-parent households is 27.3 children per 1,000, whereas the rate of overall maltreatment in two-parent households is 15.5 per 1,000.
Daughters of single parents without a Father involved are 53% more likely to marry as teenagers, 711% more likely to have children as teenagers, 164% more likely to have a pre-marital birth and 92% more likely to get divorced themselves.
Adolescent girls raised in a 2 parent home with involved Fathers are significantly less likely to be sexually active than girls raised without involved Fathers.
• 43% of US children live without their father [US Department of Census]
• 90% of homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census]
• 80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes. [Criminal Justice & Behaviour, Vol 14, pp. 403-26, 1978]
• 71% of pregnant teenagers lack a father. [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services press release, Friday, March 26, 1999]
• 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census]
• 85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. [Center for Disease Control]
• 90% of adolescent repeat arsonists live with only their mother. [Wray Herbert, “Dousing the Kindlers,” Psychology Today, January, 1985, p. 28]
• 71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes. [National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools]
• 75% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes. [Rainbows for all God’s Children]
• 70% of juveniles in state operated institutions have no father. [US Department of Justice, Special Report, Sept. 1988]
• 85% of youths in prisons grew up in a fatherless home. [Fulton County Georgia jail populations, Texas Department of Corrections, 1992]
• Fatherless boys and girls are: twice as likely to drop out of high school; twice as likely to end up in jail; four times more likely to need help for emotional or behavioral problems. [US D.H.H.S. news release, March 26, 1999]
Census Fatherhood Statistics
• 64.3 million: Estimated number of fathers across the nation
• 26.5 million: Number of fathers who are part of married-couple families with their own children under the age of 18.
Among these fathers –
o 22 percent are raising three or more of their own children under 18 years old (among married-couple family households only).
o 2 percent live in the home of a relative or a non-relative.
• 2.5 million: Number of single fathers, up from 400,000 in 1970. Currently, among single parents living with their children, 18 percent are men.
Among these fathers –
o 8 percent are raising three or more of their own children under 18 years old.
o 42 percent are divorced, 38 percent have never married, 16 percent are separated and 4 percent are widowed. (The percentages of those divorced and never married are not significantly different from one another.)
o 16 percent live in the home of a relative or a non-relative.
o 27 percent have an annual family income of $50,000 or more.
• 85 percent: Among the 30.2 million fathers living with children younger than 18, the percentage who lived with their biological children only.
o 11 percent lived with step-children
o 4 percent with adopted children
o < 1 percent with foster children
Recent policies encourage the development of programs designed to improve the economic status of low-income nonresident fathers and the financial and emotional support provided to their children. This brief provides ten key lessons from several important early responsible fatherhood initiatives that were developed and implemented during the 1990s and early 2000s. Formal evaluations of these earlier fatherhood efforts have been completed making this an opportune time to step back and assess what has been learned and how to build on the early programs’ successes and challenges.While the following statistics are formidable, the Responsible Fatherhood research literature generally supports the claim that a loving and nurturing father improves outcomes for children, families and communities.
• Children with involved, loving fathers are significantly more likely to do well in school, have healthy self-esteem, exhibit empathy and pro-social behavior, and avoid high-risk behaviors such as drug use, truancy, and criminal activity compared to children who have uninvolved fathers.
• Studies on parent-child relationships and child wellbeing show that father love is an important factor in predicting the social, emotional, and cognitive development and functioning of children and young adults.
• 24 million children (34 percent) live absent their biological father.
• Nearly 20 million children (27 percent) live in single-parent homes.
• 43 percent of first marriages dissolve within fifteen years; about 60 percent of divorcing couples have children; and approximately one million children each year experience the divorce of their parents.
• Fathers who live with their children are more likely to have a close, enduring relationship with their children than those who do not.
• Compared to children born within marriage, children born to cohabiting parents are three times as likely to experience father absence, and children born to unmarried, non-cohabiting parents are four times as likely to live in a father-absent home.
• About 40 percent of children in father-absent homes have not seen their father at all during the past year; 26 percent of absent fathers live in a different state than their children; and 50 percent of children living absent their father have never set foot in their father’s home.
• Children who live absent their biological fathers are, on average, at least two to three times more likely to be poor, to use drugs, to experience educational, health, emotional and behavioral problems, to be victims of child abuse, and to engage in criminal behavior than their peers who live with their married, biological (or adoptive) parents.
• From 1995 to 2000, the proportion of children living in single-parent homes slightly declined, while the proportion of children living with two married parents remained stable.
I'm not entirely sure what your point about divorce is, as it shouldn't have an effect on how involved a father is unless the government restricts them.
I have been seperated from my ex-wife for two years, and we have a four year old son. We both see him every single day. She keeps him during daytime hours while I work, and I keep him from late afternoon til bed time. Every Day. He stays at my house every other night, and her's the rest. We never have babysitters, and the government (so far) has no involvment with our agreement, as our divorce has yet to be filed.
Neither of us intend to get lawyers, as neither of us have assets to argue over. We will file the paperwork directly at the courthouse, and the 50/50 set up we have will remain.
Here's the deal. It's great that you share your son (for now). Hopefully you can keep things rational with your ex-wife. It's an entirely different matter when your wife commits adultery, leaves the state in which you currently reside, establishes jurisdiction in another state by living there 6 months with your children without your consent, then files for divorce while you are busy working full-time providing the family health insurance, paying for two homes, two sets of utility bills, etc..
When you DO finally go to file paperwork at the courthouse, you will most likely be REQUIRED to name a "superior" or "custodial parent" and an "inferior" or "non-custodial parent" and will be ordered to pay 'child support' to the "superior" parent. This is because all such transactions are recorded by your State Disbursement Unit ('SDU' per 42 USC 666) which files reports with the federal government periodically to rake in matching funds which are poured into your state proportional to the harm done to your children and their financial futures. The more one of you (the "inferior non-custodial parent" is extorted, the more your state bureaucrats and judges benefit from the matching federal welfare dollars! Hence, the more you and your kids are screwed, the more lucrative it is for your state government!!
My home state of Kentucky in fact just passed a law that all but requires parents to share custody down the middle. It's literally one of the only things this state government has done right in recent history.
I'm sorry to hear how that all happened, and I know that what I have is incredibly rare. I grew up with my ex wife, and we were able to put pettiness aside for the well being of our son.
I also know that most states will completely fuck over a caring father, then put out statistics about how fathers don't care...
The unasked question is how children end up "fatherless".
There is an epidemic of abuse of women and children. Women leave their partners because of this, despite all the difficulties that they experience doing so.
Your statistics of the poor outcomes of "fatherless" children are more likely to be statistics of children who have experienced domestic violence and whose mothers have taken protective action by escaping.
Hecate,
While there are undoubtedly some cases of legitimately battered and legitimately abused women and children worldwide, it is only a perceived "epidemic" due to all the state and federal funding available ostensibly to "help" women and children (code talk for making them DEPENDENT on the Holy State for survival). It's the same reason there would be an "epidemic" of rock smashing companies popping up if the omnipotent state PAID people millions of dollars to smash rocks. In the interest of personal responsibility and rationality, we have to acknowledge that in America today there is a literal cult of dumbed down, brainwashed, 'social justice warrior' type so-called 'women' who actually believe that the mere fact they were born with vaginas is the equivalent of being sentenced to a life of doom, a form of automatic and institutionalized "victimization". This is the underlying problem and mindset much of the time in the USA. So-called "abused" women in the USA, like my spoiled ex-wife, for example, who experienced zero "abuse", zero adultery (except on her part), zero drug addiction, zero alcoholism, etc., would have you believe that her inability to live in Disney World at least 365 days/year is the equivalent of "domestic violence". This sickening contemporary "poor victim female" mindset is actually extremely insulting and utterly laughable to REAL women who are suffering REAL victimization and REAL brutalization worldwide in various third world shit-holes on a daily basis. Spoiled, bratty, unappreciative, and generally obnoxious American women (in many cases, not all) really need to wake up to how good they have it relative to women in much of the world and stop pretending to be such "poor victims" all the time just because it helps them milk the Communist system we now live under. These 'women' have literally destroyed (and continue destroying) their own civilization and societies with near total State endorsement and encouragement since NOTHING is more dangerous to the cult of the omnipotent State than an educated, free-thinking, independent, self-reliant, self-sufficient FATHER having any influence or authority over his own family and/or the raising of his own children.
I dont know how well traveled you are, but I can assure you that US women do not "have it good" compared with other cultures. Lack of access to healthcare, maternity leave, the ubiquity of pornography and the rape culture which permeates US society is a perfect storm. Your characterisation of "REAL women" suggering "REAL victimisation" and "REAL brutalisation" contrasted with US women, many of women cannot even access basic reproductive healthcare, such as effective contraception, abortion and maternity care, suggests that you are not.
But then I would go further, because to me your comment reads to me very much like the kind of narrative that a REAL abuser, whose wife had managed to escape the control of, would construct. Your misogyny is on show, and its not pretty.
OMG, you are obviously a clueless inexperienced leftist SJW type. It's not the state's job nor duty to provide you with birth control, healthcare, etc.!! These are NOT legitimate government functions. The ONLY way government can provide anything is through the THEFT of the labor of others, which is immoral. Are you pro-theft? Do you claim to have a right to seize my labor and abilities so that you can buy condoms for your own activities and pleasure? Regarding "misogyny", you are dead wrong. I actually love respectable honorable brilliant women like Ayn Rand and Lauren Southern. You should look them up and let them be your mentors in life. The State is NOT your savior. It will let you down every single time.
jees...cishet white men are so touchy, touchy, touchy. Its not women's job to provide you with babies - if you want a baby, go gestate one yourself rather than through the THEFT of the (pregnancy and ) labour of others.
I'm defo with your ex-wife here. Run, girl..RUUUUN!
Race has nothing to do with anything. Children need the stability of BOTH biological parents or societal chaos inevitably results. This is really the sole purpose of marriage, to provide a stable environment in which to raise children. If women want to abandon their wedding vows and responsibilities to their own kids and families in order to go party and have more random sex before their biological clocks expire (most often stealing children from their fathers without his consent and with the aid of state force, using them merely as pretexts for extortion under the guise of 'child support'), they need to do so on their own dime and leave the children with their fathers or civilization will collapse. Divorce with children under the age of 18 should be EXTREMELY difficult for the sake of the children, but 'the state' thrives on orchestrated chaos, disorder, destruction, and collapse, which is why it deliberately promotes and encourages the destruction of marriage, the placing children in harm's way, and the destruction of the family unit. In this manner, the state ensures for itself a pipeline full of future social ills to then be "solved" by an ever-increasing cesspool of bureaucrats, agencies, higher tax rates, and bloated budgets, which of course only exacerbate the problems (which is the true intent after all!). Eventually such parasites overwhelm their hosts as even the healthiest of dogs can provide blood to only a finite number of ticks and fleas. You really need to get informed on this racket and industry hecate: www.DivorceCorp.com, www.LeonKoziol.com
You say that you dont like the state, but who is going to enforce the marriage?
What is marriage if it is not a state and/or religious enforced institution. People should be free to have the relationships they choose.
There is a very easy way of guaranteeing that your spouse will never divorce you - dont get married.
Marriage is NOT a state institution hecate. That's a public school myth along with many other such indoctrinations. It is primarily a religious and cultural institution which has been shown to be important for the purpose of raising kids. The state only got involved with "licensing" marriage to allow for inter-racial marriage which is reportedly biblically prohibited and was not legal for many decades. Look it up. You have a right to marry with no "license". It is not a state-granted privilege despite propaganda.
In any divorce, (which should have legitimate grounds like adultery, addiction, or abuse), the state's/church's only legitimate role is to PROTECT individual rights and children's relationships with their parents at all cost, NOT to destroy them and turn it into a child trafficking INDUSTRY for profit as is the situation today. If an immature idiotic parent just decides they're not having sufficient "fun" anymore and wants to make decisions according to their hormones and 'feelings' and go party with new sex partners (a very common and destructive theme for 'mothers' around age 30-37 as their biological clocks are winding down), she should not then be granted control of the children and have her extremely destructive and immoral behavior further REWARDED with funds extorted from the responsible parent opposing it all. So-called 'no-fault' divorce is a cancer upon the family, children, and society and it's all being done BY DESIGN. Sure, you should be free to have the relationships you want AND suffer all accompanying consequences at your OWN expense. I agree that no one should get married under today's diabolical, pro-destruction, pro-theft, anti-family, anti-child system which punishes good and rewards evil.