p.s. instead of the tag "mainstreammedia" try "fakemainstreamnews" and "conspiracy" instead of "mediatactics" -- that should get you more views. But don't use more than 4 tags right now as Steemit is glitching if you use 5.
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Dec 09. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $5.19 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
We now have the technical capability to allow each person to decide their chain of trust themselves. No censoring at all is required. In such a system, imagine a person defining a set of sources that they trust highly and a set they distrust highly. Implicitly, that person trusts/distrust the networks of those sources indirectly. The result is a type of Bayesian map unique to an individual that explicitly or implicitly allows a trust value to be assigned for all sources. The public exchange of trust maps allows the left, right, good, evil etc. to all tailor what they determine their trust characteristics to be and create their unique observation window of the world. The concept of absolute truth is irrelevant. This is increasingly important as the information explosion makes direct observation an ever decreasing percentage of our knowledge.
We get to decide (and I don't mean, "us Jews", I mean all of us). But it takes some work to find out.
Welcome to Steemit and Great First Article!
.. by the way, thanks for resteeming one of my articles last week!
p.s. instead of the tag "mainstreammedia" try "fakemainstreamnews" and "conspiracy" instead of "mediatactics" -- that should get you more views. But don't use more than 4 tags right now as Steemit is glitching if you use 5.
Thanks! I'm on the low end of the learning curve when it comes to formatting issues and tags
You are welcome. I know it's a big learning curve.
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Dec 09. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $5.19 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Dec 09 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.
Who Gets To Decide What Is Or Isn’t Fake News? The Jews
The question is stupid - not Who but the Facts themselves do decide
We now have the technical capability to allow each person to decide their chain of trust themselves. No censoring at all is required. In such a system, imagine a person defining a set of sources that they trust highly and a set they distrust highly. Implicitly, that person trusts/distrust the networks of those sources indirectly. The result is a type of Bayesian map unique to an individual that explicitly or implicitly allows a trust value to be assigned for all sources. The public exchange of trust maps allows the left, right, good, evil etc. to all tailor what they determine their trust characteristics to be and create their unique observation window of the world. The concept of absolute truth is irrelevant. This is increasingly important as the information explosion makes direct observation an ever decreasing percentage of our knowledge.