Another beautiful mind blowing post!

Dome – This aspect was quite interesting to think about! The possibility that the dome is the concentric culmination of magnetic energy and vibration made me think about the human skull. It is not perfectly dome shaped but at its peak, the culminating connection between the sutures it is an off-shaped dome. It perhaps either hones down the energy coming from without or hones down the energy that we project. I find it interesting that the human skull is shaped in this manner, to perhaps unknowingly focus the energies into such an important aspect of our bodies.

The love and hate vibration section – I read somewhere that somebody did an experiment with two plants in a separate part of their house with equal environmental conditions; they expressed love and compassion to one plant through words and feelings and the plant thrived while the other plant they exuded hate and malice through words and thoughts and the plant shriveled and died. It speaks volumes about the vibrational natures of our words and thoughts and how they affect the world around us. I tried searching the net for it and there was the Ikea experiment which is perhaps similar but I am referring to the original, I just don’t know when or who did it.

The synchronicity of déjà vu is incredible to think of; we all have those moments of déjà vu and for me at least it is a wonderful feeling albeit a little confusing. To think of it as a synchronicity that we weren’t consciously expecting is an interesting way to put it, thanks! I think that is a good way to describe it.

The cell fractal thought is profound and fun to think about; what are the exponential increases of the cellular nature of our reality? Could it be similar to the possibility introduced in the Men in Black movie where our universe is a marble which is held by a being on a necklace or played in a game of marbles? Quite an interesting thought.

The Bohm and Aspect part was intriguing. I had heard of the Aspect part but very diluted through different avenues, not knowing the original source. I liked that the discovery was found and not able to be explained as easily; it points to something I mentioned the other day to someone else that sure science knows things but there is still so much that it doesn’t know that it dismisses because of this lack of knowing. So many scientists are afraid to just simply say “we saw this but we have no idea what it is or why it is.” Many will not grow because of that lack of ability to admit to such a thing. I think that there truly is an infinity of development we just have not been able to achieve yet. It is perfectly fine and acceptable we haven’t achieved it too! Some would say that it is ridiculous and we are at the peak of our innovation; I say we are not, we still have so much to learn and innovate and it is foolish to think that we are so highly developed.

I agree that the nature of consciousness is lost on the top academics. They rely too heavily on the formulas and calculations you mentioned and lack the understanding. I think that this is what separates the people like Newton and Einstein from others; they saw the macro and were able to develop their own versions of this and then explain it down into things like calculations and theories. Too many rely on looking back at their works and modifying calculations and formulas without the ability to think about their own and follow that thought.

The implications of the transhumanism, human 2.0 are chilling. They make it sound like doing things like thinking for ourselves and not relying on computers or connecting ourselves to “the grid” are bad. I think that it is absolutely an insidious agenda that is borne out of the military. This attempt to disconnect us from things that make us human are a bad path to approach, but so many think heading that way is a good idea.

As always, appreciate the writing you do and the intellectual stimulation you provide!