I think I found a hypocritical statement from the great Dan Larimer
In Dan's recent interview with Epicenter, he commented that Bitshares is a superior platform to run ICO's on vs. Etheruem. It seems to me the most logical question to @dan would be, "if Bitshares is superior for ICO's, why didn't you run EOS on it?"
What do you guys think?
Here's the link to the video. Comment is at 13:00
There is a difference between technologically superior and business plan superior.
@dan could you please answer the question they asked you on minute 38.40? Can we sale/trade the unused tokens after the software is implemented and a blockchain is live on it? or in other words, will the tokens be transferable?
Simple reason: BitShares investors and users are smart while on Ethereum ICOs can raise hundreds of millions on just a few lines of code.
:D
What do you mean by "smart"? If Bitshares is technologically superior, then why can't you raise hundreds of millions like you can with Ethereum?
His point was that EOS will be superior to Ethereum. I wouldn't look into the Bitshares comment too much.