Is it weird if that doesn't worry me at all?
To me it seems only logic not to accept just anybody who wants to roll out a blockchain with EOS software, but have a minimum of support before enabling that. Whether that should be exact 15% or a bit higher or lower can be set by the community at a later stage. Starting off with 15% seems to make sense to me.
I was thinking that it was a little high and that it could possibly stifle any attempt to launch a blockchain, but the more I read what has been posted in the comments here and the resources linked to, the more I'm beginning to agree with you. 🙂
Most investors in EOS tokens are incentivized to acknowledge at least 1 chain. The terms and conditions are pretty clear on what happens when no chain is successfully launched: tokens would be worthless and completely useless.
But you wouldn't want thousands of EOS chains either, that just about anyone can start one, it would destruct the forming of robust ecosystems with dapps.
Absolutely.
Allowing for multiple "official" EOS blockchains while protecting against unlimited, uncontroled use. That's pretty much the conclusion I've come to on this. Would you say that's a fair summary?